Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29722097›Full record

ArticleAnimal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho2018

Productive and economic parameters of pigs supplemented from weaning to finishing with prebiotic and probiotic feed additives.

Néstor Méndez-Palacios, Maximino Méndez-Mendoza, Felicitas Vázquez-Flores, José G Castro-Colombres, J Efrén Ramírez-Bribiesca

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal science journal = Nihon chikusan Gakkaiho, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Néstor Méndez-PalaciosBenemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (Benemérita Autonomous University of Puebla), School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Puebla, Mexico.
Maximino Méndez-MendozaBenemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (Benemérita Autonomous University of Puebla), School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Puebla, Mexico.
Felicitas Vázquez-FloresBenemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (Benemérita Autonomous University of Puebla), School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Puebla, Mexico.
José G Castro-ColombresBenemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla (Benemérita Autonomous University of Puebla), School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Puebla, Mexico.
J Efrén Ramírez-BribiescaColegio de Postgraduados (College of Postgraduates), Animal Production Program, Montecillo, State of Mexico, Mexico.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2549-3353
Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla · MXColegio de Postgraduados · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Practical evidence suggests possible beneficial effects with the combined use of prebiotics and probiotics which can improve production parameters. The objective of the study was to investigate the addition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (SC) as prebiotic and the combination of Lactobacillus spp. (L), Bacillus spp. (B) as probiotics on productive parameters and economic feasibility. Four hundred male pigs, hybrids of commercial genetic lines (Pietrain), were used: T1 = control group, T2 = 4 kg/tonne SC, T3 = 0.8 kg/tonne feed L and B, T4 = 4 kg/tonne SC + 0.8 kg/tonne L and B. Productive parameters were recorded in the treatment groups for four periods. Then, the viscera of five pigs per treatment were collected after slaughter to evaluate the histological changes and cytokine concentrations in the ileum. The weight gains of groups at 70-100, 100-125 and 125-150 days in the T4 group showed statistically increases (p < .05). Feed intake had a significant difference (p < .05) in T3 versus T1. The feed-conversion ratio improved for all periods in the T4 group (p < .05). The eosinophil, mononuclear infiltration and cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6) in the mucosa were lower for treatments with probiotics. In conclusion, there was an economic benefit when using both prebiotics and probiotics in the diet of pigs from weaning to finishing.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsWeight GainAnimal FeedAnimal HusbandryAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBacillusBreedingDietEatingEosinophilsHumansIleumInterleukin-6Intestinal MucosaLactobacillusInterleukin-6PrebioticsTumor Necrosis Factor-alphacostsintestineperformancepigsprebioticsprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID29722097
PMCPMC7159736
OpenAlexW2802882561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.