Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29722006›Full record

ArticleFood and environmental virology2018

A One-Year Survey of Norovirus in UK Oysters Collected at the Point of Sale.

J A Lowther, N E Gustar, A L Powell, S O'Brien, D N Lees

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food and environmental virology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Species-SpecificMarine drugs · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Analysis of the European baseline survey of norovirus in oysters.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J A LowtherCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Weymouth, DT4 8UB, UK. james.lowther@cefas.co.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1434-1888
N E GustarCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Weymouth, DT4 8UB, UK.
A L PowellCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Weymouth, DT4 8UB, UK.
S O'BrienInstitute of Psychology, Health & Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England, UK.
D N LeesCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Weymouth, DT4 8UB, UK.

Funding

Food Standards Agency FS101040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contamination of bivalve shellfish, particularly oysters, with norovirus is recognised as a food safety risk and a potential contributor to the overall burden of gastroenteritis in the community. The United Kingdom (UK) has comprehensive national baseline data on the prevalence, levels, and seasonality of norovirus in oysters in production areas resulting from a previous two-year study (2009-2011). However, previously, data on final product as sold to the consumer have been lacking. As part of a wider project to establish the overall burden of foodborne norovirus in the UK, this study aimed to address this data gap. A one-year survey of oysters collected from the point-of-sale to the consumer was carried out from March 2015 to March 2016. A total of 630 samples, originating in five different European Union Member States, were collected from 21 regions across the UK using a randomised sampling plan, and tested for norovirus using a method compliant with ISO 15216-1, in addition to Escherichia coli as the statutory indicator of hygiene status. As in the previous production area study, norovirus RNA was detected in a high proportion of samples (68.7%), with a strong winter seasonality noted. Some statistically significant differences in prevalences and levels in oysters from different countries were noted, with samples originating in the Netherlands showing lower prevalences and levels than those from either the UK or Ireland. Overall, levels detected in positive samples were considerably lower than seen previously. Investigation of potential contributing factors to this pattern of results was carried out. Application of normalisation factors to the data from the two studies based on both the numbers of norovirus illness reports received by national surveillance systems, and the national average environmental temperatures during the two study periods resulted in a much closer agreement between the two data sets, with the notably different numbers of illness reports making the major contribution to the differences observed in norovirus levels in oysters. The large majority of samples (76.5%) contained no detectable E. coli; however, in a small number of samples (2.4%) levels above the statutory end product standard (230 MPN/100 g) were detected. This study both revealed the high prevalence of norovirus RNA in oysters directly available to the UK consumer, despite the high level of compliance with the existing E. coli-based health standards, while also highlighting the difficulty in comparing the results of surveys carried out in different time periods, due to variability in risk factors.

Indexed as

CommerceFood MicrobiologyAnimalsCaliciviridae InfectionsEscherichia coliFoodborne DiseasesGastroenteritisHumansHygieneIrelandNetherlandsNorovirusOstreidaePrevalenceRNA, ViralSeasonsRNA, ViralNorovirusOystersqRT-PCRSurvey

Identifiers

PMID29722006
PMCPMC6096945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.