ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2018
Molecular Findings in Families with an Initial Diagnose of Autosomal Dominant Retinitis Pigmentosa (adRP).
Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Natural history of retinitis pigmentosa based on genotype, vitamin A/E supplementation, and an electroretinogram biomarker.JCI insight · 2023Trial
- Identification and functional validation of a novel disease-causing variant in the noncoding region of NYX.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Article
- The landscape of variants in pre-mRNA-processing factor genes in an Irish cohort.Genetics in medicine open · 2026Article
- Inherited retinal diseases in Kentucky: diagnostic yield, gene variants, and novel mutations in a U.S. population.BMC medical genomics · 2025Observational
- Divergent Manifestations in Biallelic Versus Monoallelic Variants of RP1-, BEST1-, and PROM1-Associated Retinal Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Retinitis pigmentosa with iris coloboma due to miR-204 gene variant in a Chinese family.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic testing of probands in families with an initial diagnosis of autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP) usually confirms the diagnosis, but there are exceptions. We report results of genetic testing in a large cohort of adRP families with an emphasis on exceptional cases including X-linked RP with affected females; homozygous affected individuals in families with heterozygous, dominant disease; and independently segregating mutations in the same family. Genetic testing was conducted in more than 700 families with a provisional or probable diagnosis of adRP. Exceptions to the proposed mode of inheritance were extracted from our comprehensive patient and family database. In a subset of 300 well-characterized families with a probable diagnosis of adRP, 195 (70%) have dominant mutations in known adRP genes but 25 (8%) have X-linked mutations, 3 (1%) have multiple segregating mutations, and 3 (1%) have dominant-acting mutations in genes previously associated with recessive disease. It is currently possible to determine the underlying disease-causing gene and mutation in approximately 80% of families with an initial diagnosis of adRP, but 10% of "adRP" families have a variant mode of inheritance. Informed genetic diagnosis requires close collaboration between clinicians, genetic counselors, and laboratory scientists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.