Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29721738›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2018

Patient-pharmacist communication during a post-discharge pharmacist home visit.

Hendrik T Ensing, Marcia Vervloet, Ad A van Dooren, Marcel L Bouvy, Ellen S Koster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Community pharmacist's perspective regarding patient-centred communication in conjunction with pharmaceutical practice: A cross-sectional survey.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Patient Compliance: Fact or Fiction?Innovations in pharmacy · 2019
    Article
  8. Patient Safety: A Deep Concern to Caregivers.Innovations in pharmacy · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hendrik T EnsingResearch Group Process Innovations in Pharmaceutical Care, Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands. rensing@zorggroep-almere.nl.
Marcia VervloetNIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ad A van DoorenResearch Group Process Innovations in Pharmaceutical Care, Utrecht University of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marcel L BouvyDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ellen S KosterDepartment of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background With the shifting role of community pharmacists towards patient education and counselling, they are well-positioned to conduct a post-discharge home visit which could prevent or solve drug-related problems. Gaining insight into the communication during these home visits could be valuable for optimizing and consequently improving patient safety at readmission to primary care. Objective To assess patient-pharmacist communication during a post-discharge home visit. Setting The homes of patients recently discharged from a single general hospital in the Netherlands. Methods Pharmacists used a semi-structured protocol to guide the consultations and audiorecorded them. Sixty audio-recordings were included for a qualitative analysis in this study with the help of NVivo version 11 software. Main outcome measure (1) Initiator and topics under discussion. (2) Frequency of discussion of topics as per coded in themes and subthemes. Results Issues regarding the administration and use of medication, e.g. regimen and actual drug-taking issues, knowledge gaps regarding their medication and patients' health were discussed most frequently, followed by medication logistics and medication effectiveness. Patients' beliefs about their medication and adherence were less frequently discussed. The pharmacist initiated the majority of these topics. Additional non-protocolled topics were scarce and consisted mainly of patient-initiated dissatisfaction regarding the community pharmacy or health insurers. Conclusion Community pharmacists most frequently initiated practical issues, but explored patients' medication beliefs less adequately. Discussing these beliefs might be easier by increasing patient engagement in the consultation and providing training programs for pharmacists.

Indexed as

CommunicationHouse CallsProfessional-Patient RelationsAgedCommunity Pharmacy ServicesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient DischargePatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionProfessional RoleCommunity pharmacistContinuity of careHome visitsHospital dischargePatient-provider communicationSeamless careThe NetherlandsTransitions of care

Identifiers

PMID29721738
PMCPMC5984961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.