Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29721628›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2018

Impact of tumor localization on the outcomes of surgery for an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Tatsuya Orimo, Toshiya Kamiyama, Tomoko Mitsuhashi, Hirofumi Kamachi, Hideki Yokoo, Kenji Wakayama, Shingo Shimada, Akihisa Nagatsu, Akinobu Taketomi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Frozen sections in hepatobiliary surgery].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Preoperative subcategorization based on magnetic resonance imaging in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tatsuya OrimoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, North 15-West 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan. kaorioritatsu@ybb.ne.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4398-0697
Toshiya KamiyamaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, North 15-West 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Tomoko MitsuhashiDepartment of Surgical Pathology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.
Hirofumi KamachiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, North 15-West 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Hideki YokooDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, North 15-West 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Kenji WakayamaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, North 15-West 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Shingo ShimadaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, North 15-West 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Akihisa NagatsuDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, North 15-West 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Akinobu TaketomiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, North 15-West 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
Hokkaido University · JPHokkaido University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) shows differing clinical outcomes depending on its localization.

methodsWe reviewed the surgical outcomes of 104 ICC patients who underwent liver resection at our institution. We divided ICC into hilar type (HICC) and peripheral type (PICC) depending on positive contact with the hepatic hilum on preoperative computed tomography (CT).

resultsThe survival outcomes were significantly poorer in HICC patients. HICCs showed a larger tumor size and more frequent bile duct invasion, lymph node metastasis, and non-curative resection than PICC. Resections for HICC had greater blood loss and required a longer operation time, larger hepatectomy, and more frequent extrahepatic bile duct resection. HICCs, even if small in size, also showed a greater tendency to metastasize to the lymph nodes of the hepatoduodenal ligament. Univariate analysis of the ICCs in our current cohort revealed that tumor size, multiple tumors, bile duct invasion, lymph node metastasis, non-curative resection, and HICC are associated with a poorer overall survival outcome. Multivariate analysis indicated that multiple tumors and non-curative resection were independent prognostic factors for survival. Among the curative resection cases, however, survival did not differ significantly between HICC and PICC. The accuracy rate of our CT-based classification for the pathological classification was 81.7%.

conclusionsHICC shows more frequent bile duct invasion and lymph node metastasis, requires more extensive surgery, and has a higher rate of non-curative resection than PICC. However, if curative resection is achieved, the survival outcomes are expected to be equivalent between HICC and PICC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaFemaleHepatectomyHumansLiver NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPerioperative CarePrognosisRisk FactorsHilar typeIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaPeripheral type

Identifiers

PMID29721628
OpenAlexW2800508564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.