Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29721515›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2018

Combination of computer extracted shape and texture features enables discrimination of granulomas from adenocarcinoma on chest computed tomography.

Mahdi Orooji, Mehdi Alilou, Sagar Rakshit, Niha Beig, Mohammad Hadi Khorrami, Prabhakar Rajiah, Rajat Thawani, Jennifer Ginsberg, Christopher Donatelli, Michael Yang and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Feature selection methods and predictive models in CT lung cancer radiomics.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Mahdi OroojiCase Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Mehdi AlilouCase Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0119-7322
Sagar RakshitCleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8298-5971
Niha BeigCase Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1150-5886
Mohammad Hadi KhorramiCase Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Prabhakar RajiahUT Southwestern, Department of Radiology, Dallas, Texas, United States.
Rajat ThawaniCase Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5378-9434
Jennifer GinsbergUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Division of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0342-475X
Christopher DonatelliUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Michael YangUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Frank JaconoUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Robert GilkesonUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Department of Radiology, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Vamsidhar VelchetiCleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Solid Tumor Oncology, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Philip LindenUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Division of Thoracic and Esophageal Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7385-4766
Anant MadabhushiCase Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5741-0399

Funding

Computerized histologic image predictor of cancer outcomeR01CA202752 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI FELDMAN, MICHAEL D, GANESAN, SHRIDAR · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Computerized Histologic Risk Predictor (CHiRP) for Early Stage Lung CancersR01CA216579 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI FU, PINGFU, LLOYD, MARK · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
MR Fingerprinting and Computerized Decision Support for Prostate CancerR01CA208236 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GULANI, VIKAS, PONSKY, LEE EVAN · 2017 to 2022
$3.0M
Pathology Image Informatics Platform for visualization, analysis and managementU24CA199374 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GURCAN, METIN NAFI, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
Comprehensive quantitative ultrafast 3D liver MRIR01DK098503 · NIDDK · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GULANI, VIKAS, SEIBERLICH, NICOLE · 2013 to 2017
$2.6M
Histologic image-based aggressiveness prediction in p16+ oropharyngeal carcinomaR21CA179327 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2014 to 2015
$389k
Computerized morphologic-molecular predictor of progression in DCISR21CA195152 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI BADVE, SUNIL S., MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2015 to 2016
$388k
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH FACILITIESC06RR012463 · NCRR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KUTINA, KENNETH L · 1997 to 1997
–
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA202752NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208236NCI NIH HHS R01 CA216579NCI NIH HHS R21 CA179327NCI NIH HHS R21 CA195152NCI NIH HHS U24 CA199374NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR012463NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK098503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differentiation between benign and malignant nodules is a problem encountered by radiologists when visualizing computed tomography (CT) scans. Adenocarcinomas and granulomas have a characteristic spiculated appearance and may be fluorodeoxyglucose avid, making them difficult to distinguish for human readers. In this retrospective study, we aimed to evaluate whether a combination of radiomic texture and shape features from noncontrast CT scans can enable discrimination between granulomas and adenocarcinomas. Our study is composed of CT scans of 195 patients from two institutions, one cohort for training ([Formula: see text]) and the other ([Formula: see text]) for independent validation. A set of 645 three-dimensional texture and 24 shape features were extracted from CT scans in the training cohort. Feature selection was employed to identify the most informative features using this set. The top ranked features were also assessed in terms of their stability and reproducibility across the training and testing cohorts and between scans of different slice thickness. Three different classifiers were constructed using the top ranked features identified from the training set. These classifiers were then validated on the test set and the best classifier (support vector machine) yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 77.8%.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputed tomography scancomputer-assisted diagnosislung cancerphenotype

Identifiers

PMID29721515
PMCPMC5904542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.