Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29721371›Full record

ArticleOncoimmunology

Complimentary mechanisms of dual checkpoint blockade expand unique T-cell repertoires and activate adaptive anti-tumor immunity in triple-negative breast tumors.

Erika J Crosby, Junping Wei, Xiao Yi Yang, Gangjun Lei, Tao Wang, Cong-Xiao Liu, Pankaj Agarwal, Alan J Korman, Michael A Morse, Kenneth Gouin and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncoimmunology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erika J CrosbyDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Junping WeiDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Xiao Yi YangDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Gangjun LeiDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Tao WangDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Cong-Xiao LiuDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Pankaj AgarwalDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Alan J KormanImmuno-Oncology Discovery, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Redwood City, CA, United States.
Michael A MorseDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Kenneth GouinDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Simon R V KnottDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Institute, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
H Kim LyerlyDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Zachary C HartmanDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Duke University · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USBristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · US

Funding

Viral Oncology Training GrantT32CA009111 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LUFTIG, MICAH A. · 1985 to 2023
$8.9M
Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA100639 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LYERLY, HERBERT KIM · 2004 to 2013
$8.0M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA100639NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive and molecularly diverse breast cancer subtype typified by the presence of p53 mutations (∼80%), elevated immune gene signatures and neoantigen expression, as well as the presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). As these factors are hypothesized to be strong immunologic prerequisites for the use of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) antibodies, multiple clinical trials testing single ICBs have advanced to Phase III, with early indications of heterogeneous response rates of <20% to anti-PD1 and anti-PDL1 ICB. While promising, these modest response rates highlight the need for mechanistic studies to understand how different ICBs function, how their combination impacts functionality and efficacy, as well as what immunologic parameters predict efficacy to different ICBs regimens in TNBC. To address these issues, we tested anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 in multiple models of TNBC and found that their combination profoundly enhanced the efficacy of either treatment alone. We demonstrate that this efficacy is due to anti-CTLA4-driven expansion of an individually unique T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire whose functionality is enhanced by both intratumoral Treg suppression and anti-PD1 blockade of tumor expressed PDL1. Notably, the individuality of the TCR repertoire was observed regardless of whether the tumor cells expressed a nonself antigen (ovalbumin) or if tumor-specific transgenic T-cells were transferred prior to sequencing. However, responsiveness was strongly correlated with systemic measures of tumor-specific T-cell and B-cell responses, which along with systemic assessment of TCR expansion, may serve as the most useful predictors for clinical responsiveness in future clinical trials of TNBC utilizing anti-PD1/anti-CTLA4 ICB.

Indexed as

breast cancercheckpoint blockadeimmune responses to cancerimmunomodulationTCR sequencingtriple-negative breast cancertumor antigens

Identifiers

PMID29721371
PMCPMC5927534
OpenAlexW2781227791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.