Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29721327›Full record

ArticleRegeneration (Oxford, England)2018

Investigation into the cellular origins of posterior regeneration in the annelid

Danielle M de Jong, Elaine C Seaver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regeneration (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Annelids as models of germ cell and gonad regeneration.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Distinct patterns of gene expression during regeneration and asexual reproduction in the annelid Pristina leidyi.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A pan-metazoan concept for adult stem cells: the wobbling Penrose landscape.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Animal regeneration in the era of transcriptomics.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Regeneration mechanisms in Syllidae (Annelida).Regeneration (Oxford, England) · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Danielle M de JongWhitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience University of Florida St Augustine FL 32080 USA.
Elaine C SeaverWhitney Laboratory for Marine Bioscience University of Florida St Augustine FL 32080 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6773-723X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many animals can regenerate, although there is great diversity in regenerative capabilities. A major question in regenerative biology is determining the cellular source of newly formed tissue. The polychaete annelid,

Indexed as

annelidCapitellacell migrationregenerationstem cells

Identifiers

PMID29721327
PMCPMC5911572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.