Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29721325›Full record

ReviewRegeneration (Oxford, England)2018

Regeneration mechanisms in Syllidae (Annelida).

Rannyele P Ribeiro, Christoph Bleidorn, M Teresa Aguado

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Regeneration (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Annelids as models of germ cell and gonad regeneration.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2024
    Review
  5. Journal of developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  6. The sea spiderProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Editorial: Regeneration from cells to limbs: past, present, and future.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  9. A pan-metazoan concept for adult stem cells: the wobbling Penrose landscape.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Characterization ofBiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Regeneration mechanisms in Syllidae (Annelida).Regeneration (Oxford, England) · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rannyele P RibeiroDepartamento de Biología Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Cantoblanco 28049 Madrid Spain.
Christoph BleidornAnimal Evolution and Biodiversity Georg-August-Universität Göttingen 37073 Göttingen Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7295-6616
M Teresa AguadoDepartamento de Biología Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Cantoblanco 28049 Madrid Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5583-7516
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Syllidae is one of the most species-rich groups within Annelida, with a wide variety of reproductive modes and different regenerative processes. Syllids have striking ability to regenerate their body anteriorly and posteriorly, which in many species is redeployed during sexual (schizogamy) and asexual (fission) reproduction. This review summarizes the available data on regeneration in syllids, covering descriptions of regenerative mechanisms in different species as well as regeneration in relation to reproductive modes. Our survey shows that posterior regeneration is widely distributed in syllids, whereas anterior regeneration is limited in most of the species, excepting those reproducing by fission. The latter reproductive mode is well known for a few species belonging to Autolytinae, Eusyllinae, and Syllinae. Patterns of fission areas have been studied in these animals. Deviations of the regular regeneration pattern or aberrant forms such as bifurcated animals or individuals with multiple heads have been reported for several species. Some of these aberrations show a deviation of the bilateral symmetry and antero-posterior axis, which, interestingly, can also be observed in the regular branching body pattern of some species of syllids.

Indexed as

annelidepimorphosisfissionmorphallaxisschizogamy

Identifiers

PMID29721325
PMCPMC5911452
OpenAlexW2793037321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.