Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29721287›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2018

The effect of gut microbiota elimination in

Chloe Heys, Anne Lizé, Frances Blow, Lewis White, Alistair Darby, Zenobia J Lewis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Metagenomic Survey of the Highly PolyphagousFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chloe HeysSchool of Life Sciences/Institute of Integrative Biology University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.
Anne LizéSchool of Life Sciences/Institute of Integrative Biology University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.
Frances BlowSchool of Life Sciences/Institute of Integrative Biology University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.
Lewis WhiteSchool of Life Sciences/Institute of Integrative Biology University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8764-2051
Alistair DarbySchool of Life Sciences/Institute of Integrative Biology University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.
Zenobia J LewisSchool of Life Sciences/Institute of Integrative Biology University of Liverpool Liverpool UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9464-7638

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a surge in interest in the effects of the microbiota on the host. Increasingly, we are coming to understand the importance of the gut microbiota in modulating host physiology, ecology, behavior, and evolution. One method utilized to evaluate the effect of the microbiota is to suppress or eliminate it, and compare the effect on the host with that of untreated individuals. In this study, we evaluate some of these commonly used methods in the model organism,

Indexed as

Drosophilalife‐history traitsmicrobiotaphysiology

Identifiers

PMID29721287
PMCPMC5916298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.