Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29721177›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

A pilot study of durvalumab and tremelimumab and immunogenomic dynamics in metastatic breast cancer.

Cesar August Santa-Maria, Taigo Kato, Jae-Hyun Park, Kazuma Kiyotani, Alfred Rademaker, Ami N Shah, Leeaht Gross, Luis Z Blanco, Sarika Jain, Lisa Flaum and 7 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CTLA-4 Expression and Its Clinical Significance in Breast Cancer.Archivum immunologiae et therapiae experimentalis · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Durvalumab plus Paclitaxel, with or without Capivasertib or Oleclumab, in Patients with Locally Advanced/Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Current and future immunotherapy for breast cancer.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024
    Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Cesar August Santa-MariaJohns Hopkins, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Taigo KatoThe University of Chicago, Department of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Jae-Hyun ParkThe University of Chicago, Department of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Kazuma KiyotaniThe University of Chicago, Department of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Alfred RademakerNorthwestern University, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Ami N ShahNorthwestern University, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Leeaht GrossNorthwestern University, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Luis Z BlancoNorthwestern University, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Sarika JainNorthwestern University, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Lisa FlaumNorthwestern University, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Claudia TellezNorthwestern University, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Regina SteinNorthwestern University, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Regina UtheNorthwestern University, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
William J GradisharNorthwestern University, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Massimo CristofanilliNorthwestern University, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Yusuke NakamuraThe University of Chicago, Department of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Francis J GilesNorthwestern University, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern UniversityNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Chicago · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors produce modest responses in metastatic breast cancer, however, combination approaches may improve responses. A single arm pilot study was designed to determine the overall response rate (ORR) of durvalumab and tremelimumab, and evaluate immunogenomic dynamics in metastatic endocrine receptor (ER) positive or triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Simon two-stage design indicated at least four responses from the first 18 patients were needed to proceed with the second stage. T-cell receptor (TCR) sequencing and immune-gene expression profiling were conducted at baseline and two months, whole exome sequencing was conducted at baseline. Eighteen evaluable patients were accrued (11 ER-positive; seven TNBC). Only three patients had a response (ORR = 17%), thus the study did not proceed to the second stage. Responses were only observed in patients with TNBC (ORR = 43%). Responders versus non-responders had upregulation of

Indexed as

immune checkpointimmunogenomicsmetastatic breast cancerT cell receptor sequencing

Identifiers

PMID29721177
PMCPMC5922371
OpenAlexW2798022026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.