Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29721009›Full record

Trial reportNeural plasticity2018

Biomarkers of Rehabilitation Therapy Vary according to Stroke Severity.

Erin Burke Quinlan, Lucy Dodakian, Jill See, Alison McKenzie, Jill Campbell Stewart, Steven C Cramer

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neural plasticity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erin Burke QuinlanDepartment of Anatomy & Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Lucy DodakianDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Jill SeeDepartment of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Alison McKenzieDepartment of Physical Therapy, Chapman University, Orange, CA, USA.
Jill Campbell StewartDepartment of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
Steven C CramerDepartment of Anatomy & Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6214-6211

Funding

University of California Health Participation in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR001414 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M, VILAIN, ERIC J. · 2015 to 2023
$35.1M
Institute for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000153 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M · 2012 to 2015
$12.1M
U.C. Irvine Multidisciplinary Exercise Science Training ProgramT32AR047752 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CAIOZZO, VINCENT JAMES, COOPER, DAN M · 2003 to 2018
$2.5M
Motor Function after StrokeR01NS059909 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CRAMER, STEVEN C. · 2009 to 2013
$2.0M
Brain plasticity and rehabilitation after strokeK24HD074722 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CRAMER, STEVEN C. · 2013 to 2017
$588k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000153NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001414NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR047752NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD074722NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS059909
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarkers that capture treatment effects could improve the precision of clinical decision making for restorative therapies. We examined the performance of candidate structural, functional, and angiogenesis-related MRI biomarkers before and after a 3-week course of standardized robotic therapy in 18 patients with chronic stroke and hypothesized that results vary significantly according to stroke severity. Patients were 4.1 ± 1 months poststroke, with baseline arm Fugl-Meyer scores of 20-60. When all patients were examined together, no imaging measure changed over time in a manner that correlated with treatment-induced motor gains. However, when also considering the interaction with baseline motor status, treatment-induced motor gains were significantly related to change in three functional connectivity measures: ipsilesional motor cortex connectivity with (1) contralesional motor cortex (

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingStroke RehabilitationBiomarkersBrainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecovery of FunctionRoboticsSeverity of Illness IndexStrokeTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID29721009
PMCPMC5867600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.