Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29720743›Full record

ArticleGeburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde2018

Recurrent Miscarriage: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/050).

Bettina Toth, Wolfgang Würfel, Michael Bohlmann, Johannes Zschocke, Sabine Rudnik-Schöneborn, Frank Nawroth, Ekkehard Schleußner, Nina Rogenhofer, Tewes Wischmann, Michael von Wolff and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Effect of antithyroid antibodies on women with recurrent miscarriage: A meta-analysis.American journal of reproductive immunology (New York, N.Y. : 1989) · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Bettina TothKlinik für Gynäkologische Endokrinologie und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Wolfgang WürfelKinderwunsch Centrum München, München, Germany.
Michael BohlmannUniversitätsfrauenklinik Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Johannes ZschockeZentrum für Medizinische Genetik, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Sabine Rudnik-SchönebornZentrum für Medizinische Genetik, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Frank NawrothAmedes, Hamburg, Germany.
Ekkehard SchleußnerKlinik für Geburtsmedizin, Uniklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.
Nina RogenhoferKlinikum der Universität München - Frauenklinik Maistraße, München, Germany.
Tewes WischmannInstitut für Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael von WolffUniversitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Katharina HanckeKlinik für Frauenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Sören von OtteKinderwunschzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Ruben KuonUniversitäts-Frauenklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katharina FeilKlinik für Gynäkologische Endokrinologie und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Clemens TempferUniversitätsfrauenklinik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOfficial guideline of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the Austrian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (ÖGGG) and the Swiss Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (SGGG). The aim of this guideline was to standardize the diagnosis and treatment of couples with recurrent miscarriage (RM). Recommendations were based on the current literature and the views of the involved committee members.

methodsBased on the current literature, the committee members developed the statements and recommendations of this guideline in a formalized process which included DELPHI rounds and a formal consensus meeting. RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with RM were compiled based on the international literature. Specific established risk factors such as chromosomal, anatomical, endocrine, hemostatic, psychological, infectious and immunological disorders were taken into consideration.

Indexed as

diagnosisincidencerecommendationsrecurrent miscarriagetherapy

Identifiers

PMID29720743
PMCPMC5925690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.