ArticleNature2018
Publisher Correction: Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage.
Article in Nature, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- A CS•CBE System Targeting β‑Catenin: Exploring Additional Inhibition Targets for Colon Cancer Proliferation.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Congenital Long QT Syndrome: From Conventional Management to Emerging Biological Therapies.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Harnessing mitochondrial genome editing for crop improvement: principles and applications.aBIOTECH · 2026Review
- CRISPR/Cas system as a novel therapeutic strategy to combat multi-drug-resistant bacteria.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Restoration of the immune system with base editing and non-genotoxic conditioning in a Rag2 point-mutant mouse model.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026Article
- Decoding the role of chromatin context in the off-target effects of CRISPR gene editing with EGOLD.Cell discovery · 2026Article
- Applications of Genome-wide Screening of CRISPR/Cas9 Knockout Library in Identifying Novel Molecular Targets for Xenobiotics.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- GFP-on mouse model for interrogation of in vivo gene editing.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Bystander editing by adenine base editors impairs vision restoration in a mouse model of Leber congenital amaurosis.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025Article
- Advances in human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-based disease modelling in cardiogenetics.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2025Article
- Characterization of diverse Cas9 orthologs for genome and epigenome editing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Crop bioengineering via gene editing: reshaping the future of agriculture.Plant cell reports · 2024Review
- CRISPR-Cas9 Direct Fusions for Improved Genome Editing via Enhanced Homologous Recombination.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Rescue of hearing by adenine base editing in a humanized mouse model of Usher syndrome type 1F.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023Article
- Highly efficient base editing in rabbit by using near-PAMless engineered CRISPR/Cas9 variants.Science China. Life sciences · 2023Article
- Non-Viral Delivery of CRISPR/Cas Cargo to the Retina Using Nanoparticles: Current Possibilities, Challenges, and Limitations.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Research Progress on Cloning and Function ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Enhanced genome editing efficiency of CRISPR PLUS: Cas9 chimeric fusion proteins.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Gene Therapy for Neurodegenerative Disease: Clinical Potential and Directions.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2021Review
- Toward the Treatment of Inherited Diseases of the Retina Using CRISPR-Based Gene Editing.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this Article, owing to an error during the production process, in Fig. 1a, the dark blue and light blue wedges were incorrectly labelled as 'G•C → T•A' and 'G•C → A•T', instead of 'C•G → T•A' and 'C•G → A•T', respectively. Fig. 1 has been corrected online.
Identifiers
29720650What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.