Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29720589›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Precisely timed inhibition facilitates action potential firing for spatial coding in the auditory brainstem.

Barbara Beiderbeck, Michael H Myoga, Nicolas I C Müller, Alexander R Callan, Eckhard Friauf, Benedikt Grothe, Michael Pecka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. GABA corelease guides the functional maturation of glycinergic synapses in an auditory sound localization circuit.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Dynamics of interaction betweenCognitive neurodynamics · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara BeiderbeckDepartment Biology II, Division of Neurobiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Munich, Planegg-Martinsried, D-82152, Germany.
Michael H MyogaDepartment Biology II, Division of Neurobiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Munich, Planegg-Martinsried, D-82152, Germany.
Nicolas I C MüllerDepartment of Biology, Animal Physiology Group, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, D-67653, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4389-6268
Alexander R CallanDepartment Biology II, Division of Neurobiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Munich, Planegg-Martinsried, D-82152, Germany.
Eckhard FriaufDepartment of Biology, Animal Physiology Group, University of Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, D-67653, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1833-1698
Benedikt GrotheDepartment Biology II, Division of Neurobiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Munich, Planegg-Martinsried, D-82152, Germany. grothe@lmu.de.
Michael PeckaDepartment Biology II, Division of Neurobiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitaet Munich, Planegg-Martinsried, D-82152, Germany. pecka@bio.lmu.de.
Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology · DEBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Munich · DEUniversity of Kaiserslautern · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs is fundamental to neuronal processing. In the mammalian auditory brainstem, neurons compare excitatory and inhibitory inputs from the ipsilateral and contralateral ear, respectively, for sound localization. However, the temporal precision and functional roles of inhibition in this integration process are unclear. Here, we demonstrate by in vivo recordings from the lateral superior olive (LSO) that inhibition controls spiking with microsecond precision throughout high frequency click trains. Depending on the relative timing of excitation and inhibition, neuronal spike probability is either suppressed or-unexpectedly-facilitated. In vitro conductance-clamp LSO recordings establish that a reduction in the voltage threshold for spike initiation due to a prior hyperpolarization results in post-inhibitory facilitation of otherwise sub-threshold synaptic events. Thus, microsecond-precise differences in the arrival of inhibition relative to excitation can facilitate spiking in the LSO, thereby promoting spatial sensitivity during the processing of faint sounds.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAction PotentialsAlgorithmsAnimalsAuditory PathwaysBrain StemGerbillinaeModels, NeurologicalNeural InhibitionNeuronsSound LocalizationSuperior Olivary ComplexSynaptic TransmissionTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID29720589
PMCPMC5932051
OpenAlexW2801080196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.