Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29720410›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2018

Mammoth grazers on the ocean's minuteness: a review of selective feeding using mucous meshes.

Keats R Conley, Fabien Lombard, Kelly R Sutherland

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Permeability-selectivity trade-off for a universal leaky channel inspired by mobula filters.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mechanisms of gill-clogging by hagfish slime.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Opinion: Midwater ecosystems must be considered when evaluating environmental risks of deep-sea mining.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Keats R ConleyDepartment of Biology, 5289 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA keatsconley@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-2966-1844
Fabien LombardSorbonne Universités, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Laboratoire d'Océanographie de Villefranche-sur-Mer, 06230 Villefranche-sur-Mer, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8626-8782
Kelly R SutherlandDepartment of Biology, 5289 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6832-6515
University of Oregon · USSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucous-mesh grazers (pelagic tunicates and thecosome pteropods) are common in oceanic waters and efficiently capture, consume and repackage particles many orders of magnitude smaller than themselves. They feed using an adhesive mucous mesh to capture prey particles from ambient seawater. Historically, their grazing process has been characterized as non-selective, depending only on the size of the prey particle and the pore dimensions of the mesh. The purpose of this review is to reverse this assumption by reviewing recent evidence that shows mucous-mesh feeding can be selective. We focus on large planktonic microphages as a model of selective mucus feeding because of their important roles in the ocean food web: as bacterivores, prey for higher trophic levels, and exporters of carbon via mucous aggregates, faecal pellets and jelly-falls. We identify important functional variations in the filter mechanics and hydrodynamics of different taxa. We review evidence that shows this feeding strategy depends not only on the particle size and dimensions of the mesh pores, but also on particle shape and surface properties, filter mechanics, hydrodynamics and grazer behaviour. As many of these organisms remain critically understudied, we conclude by suggesting priorities for future research.

Indexed as

Food ChainAnimalsFeeding BehaviorGastropodaHydrodynamicsMucusUrochordataZooplanktonbentho-pelagic couplinggrazerspteropodsselective feedingtunicates

Identifiers

PMID29720410
PMCPMC5966591
OpenAlexW2799743608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.