Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29720366›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2018

Studying Cannabis Use Behaviors With Facebook and Web Surveys: Methods and Insights.

Jacob T Borodovsky, Lisa A Marsch, Alan J Budney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Developing an online cannabis store paradigm for Cannabis Regulatory Science.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jacob T Borodovsky *The Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7112-5677
Lisa A Marsch *The Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6429-0965
Alan J Budney *The Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6308-6823

Funding

Treatment Development & Evaluation CoreP30DA029926 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Lisa A. Marsch · 2011 to 2026
$21.5M
Behavioral Treatment of Adolescent Marijuana UseR01DA015186 · NIDA · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI BUDNEY, ALAN JEFFREY · 2002 to 2017
$7.7M
Training in the Science of Co-Occurring DisordersT32DA037202 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Lisa A. Marsch · 2014 to 2026
$4.7M
Targeting tobacco cessation during treatment for cannabis use disordersR01DA032243 · NIDA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI BUDNEY, ALAN JEFFREY · 2012 to 2015
$1.7M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA029926NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015186NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032243NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA037202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid and wide-reaching expansion of internet access and digital technologies offers epidemiologists numerous opportunities to study health behaviors. One particularly promising new data collection strategy is the use of Facebook's advertising platform in conjunction with Web-based surveys. Our research team at the Center for Technology and Behavioral Health has used this quick and cost-efficient method to recruit large samples and address unique scientific questions related to cannabis use. In conducting this research, we have gleaned several insights for using this sampling method effectively and have begun to document the characteristics of the resulting data. We believe this information could be useful to other researchers attempting to study cannabis use or, potentially, other health behaviors. The first aim of this paper is to describe case examples of procedures for using Facebook as a survey sampling method for studying cannabis use. We then present several distinctive features of the data produced using this method. Finally, we discuss the utility of this sampling method for addressing specific types of epidemiological research questions. Overall, we believe that sampling with Facebook advertisements and Web surveys is best conceptualized as a targeted, nonprobability-based method for oversampling cannabis users across the United States.

Indexed as

cannabiscross-sectional studiesdata collectionepidemiologysampling studiessocial mediasurveys

Identifiers

PMID29720366
PMCPMC5956156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.