ArticleMicrobiome2018
Mind the gut: genomic insights to population divergence and gut microbial composition of two marine keystone species.
Article in Microbiome, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of advances in intestinal microflora of fish.Fish physiology and biochemistry · 2021Pooled it
- Multi-Omic Analysis Reveals the Potential Anti-Disease Mechanism of Disease-Resistant Grass Carp.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Reciprocal translocation experiments reveal gut microbiome plasticity and host specificity in a Qinghai-Xizang Plateau lizard.Zoological research · 2025Article
- Biodiversity of microorganisms in the Baltic Sea: the power of novel methods in the identification of marine microbes.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2024Review
- Host-gut microbiota interactions shape parasite infections in farmed Atlantic salmon.mSystems · 2024Article
- Co-diversification of an intestinal Mycoplasma and its salmonid host.The ISME journal · 2023Article
- First insights into the gut microbiomes and the diet of theEvolutionary applications · 2023Article
- Host habitat rather than evolutionary history explains gut microbiome diversity in sympatric stickleback species.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- The gut microbiome variability of a butterflyfish increases on severely degraded Caribbean reefs.Communications biology · 2022Article
- Disentangling host-microbiota complexity through hologenomics.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2022Review
- Intrahabitat Differences in Bacterial Communities Associated withApplied and environmental microbiology · 2022Article
- Recent progress in the understanding of the gut microbiota of marine fishes.Marine life science & technology · 2021Review
- Locally adapted gut microbiomes mediate host stress tolerance.The ISME journal · 2021Article
- Host development overwhelms environmental dispersal in governing the ecological succession of zebrafish gut microbiota.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2021Article
- Gut Microbial Composition and Diversity in Four Ophiuroid Species: Divergence Between Suspension Feeder and Scavenger and Their Symbiotic Microbes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Population-level inferences from environmental DNA-Current status and future perspectives.Evolutionary applications · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDeciphering the mechanisms governing population genetic divergence and local adaptation across heterogeneous environments is a central theme in marine ecology and conservation. While population divergence and ecological adaptive potential are classically viewed at the genetic level, it has recently been argued that their microbiomes may also contribute to population genetic divergence. We explored whether this might be plausible along the well-described environmental gradient of the Baltic Sea in two species of sand lance (Ammodytes tobianus and Hyperoplus lanceolatus). Specifically, we assessed both their population genetic and gut microbial composition variation and investigated not only which environmental parameters correlate with the observed variation, but whether host genome also correlates with microbiome variation.
resultsWe found a clear genetic structure separating the high-salinity North Sea from the low-salinity Baltic Sea sand lances. The observed genetic divergence was not simply a function of isolation by distance, but correlated with environmental parameters, such as salinity, sea surface temperature, and, in the case of A. tobianus, possibly water microbiota. Furthermore, we detected two distinct genetic groups in Baltic A. tobianus that might represent sympatric spawning types. Investigation of possible drivers of gut microbiome composition variation revealed that host species identity was significantly correlated with the microbial community composition of the gut. A potential influence of host genetic factors on gut microbiome composition was further confirmed by the results of a constrained analysis of principal coordinates. The host genetic component was among the parameters that best explain observed variation in gut microbiome composition.
conclusionsOur findings have relevance for the population structure of two commercial species but also provide insights into potentially relevant genomic and microbial factors with regards to sand lance adaptation across the North Sea-Baltic Sea environmental gradient. Furthermore, our findings support the hypothesis that host genetics may play a role in regulating the gut microbiome at both the interspecific and intraspecific levels. As sequencing costs continue to drop, we anticipate that future studies that include full genome and microbiome sequencing will be able to explore the full relationship and its potential adaptive implications for these species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.