Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29720244›Full record

ArticleTrials2018

Administration of taurolidine-citrate lock solution for prevention of central venous catheter infection in adult neutropenic haematological patients: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (TAURCAT).

C Gudiol, S Nicolae, C Royo-Cebrecos, M Aguilar-Guisado, I Montero, C Martín-Gandul, M Perayre, D Berbel, M Encuentra, M Arnan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

C GudiolInfectious Diseases Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, IDIBELL, Feixa Llarga SN, 08907, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. carlotagudiol@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3095-4422
S NicolaeInfectious Diseases Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, IDIBELL, Feixa Llarga SN, 08907, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
C Royo-CebrecosInfectious Diseases Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, IDIBELL, Feixa Llarga SN, 08907, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
M Aguilar-GuisadoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology, and Preventive Medicine, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío-Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Seville, Spain.
I MonteroDepartment of Haematology, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío-Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Seville, Spain.
C Martín-GandulDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology, and Preventive Medicine, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío-Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Seville, Spain.
M PerayrePharmacy Department, Clinical Trial Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
D BerbelMicrobiology Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
M EncuentraBiostatistics. Clinical Research Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
M ArnanHaematology Department, Institut Català d'Oncologia, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
J M Cisneros-HerrerosDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Microbiology, and Preventive Medicine, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío-Institute of Biomedicine of Seville, Seville, Spain.
J CarratalàInfectious Diseases Department, Bellvitge University Hospital, IDIBELL, Feixa Llarga SN, 08907, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESBellvitge University Hospital · ESInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla · ES

Funding

Insituto de Salud Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Economy REIPI RD12/0015Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Economy PI13/01474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCatheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) is one of the most frequent complications in patients with cancer who have central venous catheters (CVCs) implanted and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Taurolidine is a non-antibiotic agent with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, which has been used as a lock solution to prevent CRBSI in some settings. However, little is known about its usefulness in high-risk adult neutropenic patients with cancer. This prospective randomised clinical trial aims to test the hypothesis that taurolidine-citrate lock solution is more effective than placebo for preventing catheter infection in neutropenic haematological patients.

methodsThis study is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, parallel, superiority, placebo-controlled trial. Patients with haematological cancer who are expected to develop prolonged neutropenia (> 7 days) and who have a non-tunnelled CVC implanted will be randomised to receive prophylactic taurolidine-citrate-heparin solution using a lock technique (study group) or heparin alone (placebo group). The primary endpoint will be bacterial colonisation of the CVC hubs. The secondary endpoints will be the incidence of CRBSI, CVC removal, adverse events, and 30-day case-fatality rate. DISCUSSION: The lock technique is a preventive strategy that inhibits bacterial colonisation in the catheter hubs, which is the initial step of endoluminal catheter colonisation and the development of infection. Taurolidine is a nontoxic agent that does not develop antibiotic resistance because it acts as an antiseptic rather than an antibiotic. Taurolidine has shown controversial results in the few trials conducted in cancer patients. These studies have important limitations due to the lack of data on adult and/or high-risk neutropenic patients, the type of catheters studied (tunnelled or ports), and the lack of information regarding the intervention (e.g. dwelling of the solution, time, and periodicity of the lock technique). If our hypothesis is proven, the study could provide important solid evidence on the potential usefulness of this preventive procedure in a population at high risk of CRBSI, in whom this complication may significantly impair patient outcome.

trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN47102251 . Registered on 9 September 2015.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsCatheterization, Central VenousCatheter-Related InfectionsCatheters, IndwellingCentral Venous CathetersCitratesDevice RemovalDouble-Blind MethodEquivalence Trials as TopicHematologic NeoplasmsHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicNeutropeniaProspective StudiesRisk FactorsAnti-Infective AgentsAntineoplastic AgentsCitratesTaurinetaurolidineThiadiazinesAntibiotic lock techniqueCatheter-related bloodstream infectionCentral venous catheter infectionHaematological patientsLock solutionNeutropeniaTaurolidine-citrate

Identifiers

PMID29720244
PMCPMC5932813
OpenAlexW2807421032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.