ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2018
The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk: a cohort study.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evolving Concepts and Contemporary Management of Early-Stage Breast Cancer: An Evidence-Based Approach to Grey Zones from a Comprehensive Breast Unit Part 1: Locoregional Therapy, Pathology, Radiology.European journal of breast health · 2026Article
- Investigating the relationship between breast cancer risk factors and an AI-generated mammographic texture feature in the Nurses' Health Study II.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
- Association between Inflammatory Dietary Pattern and Mammographic Features.The Journal of nutrition · 2024Article
- Plasma C-peptide mammographic features and risk of breast cancer.NPJ breast cancer · 2024Article
- Assessment of the Breast Density Prevalence in Swiss Women with a Deep Convolutional Neural Network: A Cross-Sectional Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Clinical Significance of Combined Density and Deep-Learning-Based Texture Analysis for Stratifying the Risk of Short-Term and Long-Term Breast Cancer in Screening.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Image-Based Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Using Attention.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Article
- Deep Learning Approaches with Digital Mammography for Evaluating Breast Cancer Risk, a Narrative Review.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Review
- A genome-wide association study of mammographic texture variation.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2022Article
- Mammographic Variation Measures, Breast Density, and Breast Cancer Risk.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2021Article
- Automated percent mammographic density, mammographic texture variation, and risk of breast cancer: a nested case-control study.NPJ breast cancer · 2021Article
- Mammographic density changes during neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment: NeoDense, a prospective study in Sweden.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2020Article
- CAD and AI for breast cancer-recent development and challenges.The British journal of radiology · 2020Review
- Going Beyond Conventional Mammographic Density to Discover Novel Mammogram-Based Predictors of Breast Cancer Risk.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Measurement challenge: protocol for international case-control comparison of mammographic measures that predict breast cancer risk.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives.Radiology · 2019Review
- Sensitivity of screening mammography by density and texture: a cohort study from a population-based screening program in Denmark.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2019Article
- Generalized breast density metrics.Physics in medicine and biology · 2018Article
- Breast Ultrasound Texture Features of Family History of Breast Cancer and Contraceptive Use in Nigerian Younger Women.Journal of medical ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTexture patterns have been shown to improve breast cancer risk segregation in addition to area-based mammographic density. The additional value of texture pattern scores on top of volumetric mammographic density measures in a large screening cohort has never been studied.
methodsVolumetric mammographic density and texture pattern scores were assessed automatically for the first available digital mammography (DM) screening examination of 51,400 women (50-75 years of age) participating in the Dutch biennial breast cancer screening program between 2003 and 2011. The texture assessment method was developed in a previous study and validated in the current study. Breast cancer information was obtained from the screening registration system and through linkage with the Netherlands Cancer Registry. All screen-detected breast cancers diagnosed at the first available digital screening examination were excluded. During a median follow-up period of 4.2 (interquartile range (IQR) 2.0-6.2) years, 301 women were diagnosed with breast cancer. The associations between texture pattern scores, volumetric breast density measures and breast cancer risk were determined using Cox proportional hazard analyses. Discriminatory performance was assessed using c-indices.
resultsThe median age of the women at the time of the first available digital mammography examination was 56 years (IQR 51-63). Texture pattern scores were positively associated with breast cancer risk (hazard ratio (HR) 3.16 (95% CI 2.16-4.62) (p value for trend <0.001), for quartile (Q) 4 compared to Q1). The c-index of texture was 0.61 (95% CI 0.57-0.64). Dense volume and percentage dense volume showed positive associations with breast cancer risk (HR 1.85 (95% CI 1.32-2.59) (p value for trend <0.001) and HR 2.17 (95% CI 1.51-3.12) (p value for trend <0.001), respectively, for Q4 compared to Q1). When adding texture measures to models with dense volume or percentage dense volume, c-indices increased from 0.56 (95% CI 0.53-0.59) to 0.62 (95% CI 0.58-0.65) (p < 0.001) and from 0.58 (95% CI 0.54-0.61) to 0.60 (95% CI 0.57-0.63) (p = 0.054), respectively.
conclusionsDeep-learning-based texture pattern scores, measured automatically on digital mammograms, are associated with breast cancer risk, independently of volumetric mammographic density, and augment the capacity to discriminate between future breast cancer and non-breast cancer cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.