Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29720208›Full record

ArticleTrials2018

Smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment and intervention in a coping-focused intervention for hearing voices (SAVVy): study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Imogen H Bell, Sarah F Fielding-Smith, Mark Hayward, Susan L Rossell, Michelle H Lim, John Farhall, Neil Thomas

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Imogen H BellCentre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia. ibell@swin.edu.au.
Sarah F Fielding-SmithSussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK.
Mark HaywardSussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK.
Susan L RossellCentre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia.
Michelle H LimCentre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia.
John FarhallDepartment of Psychology and Counselling, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Neil ThomasCentre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia.
Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research centre · AUSwinburne University of Technology · AUMelbourne Health · AUSussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship NABarbara Dicker Foundation (BDF) Research Support Scheme NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSmartphone-based ecological momentary assessment and intervention (EMA/I) show promise for enhancing psychological treatments for psychosis. EMA has the potential to improve assessment and formulation of experiences which fluctuate day-to-day, and EMI may be used to prompt use of therapeutic strategies in daily life. The current study is an examination of these capabilities in the context of a brief, coping-focused intervention for distressing voice hearing experiences. METHODS/

designThis is a rater-blinded, pilot randomised controlled trial comparing a four-session intervention in conjunction with use of smartphone EMA/I between sessions, versus treatment-as-usual. The recruitment target is 34 participants with persisting and distressing voice hearing experiences, recruited through a Voices Clinic based in Melbourne, Australia, and via wider advertising. Allocation will be made using minimisation procedure, balancing of the frequency of voices between groups. Assessments are completed at baseline and 8 weeks post-baseline. The primary outcomes of this trial will focus on feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and trial methodology, with secondary outcomes examining preliminary clinical effects related to overall voice severity, the emotional and functional impact of the voices, and emotional distress. DISCUSSION: This study offers a highly novel examination of specific smartphone capabilities and their integration with traditional psychological treatment for distressing voices. Such technology has potential to enhance psychological interventions and promote adaptation to distressing experiences.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12617000348358 . Registered on 7 March 2017.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAuditory PerceptionEcological Momentary AssessmentMobile ApplicationsSmartphoneVoiceActivities of Daily LivingFeasibility StudiesHallucinationsHumansPilot ProjectsPsychotherapyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTelemedicineTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAuditory hallucinationsDigital technologyEcological momentary assessmentEcological momentary interventionHearing voicesPsychosisRandomised controlled trialSmartphone app

Identifiers

PMID29720208
PMCPMC5930938
OpenAlexW2801080350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.