Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29720165›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Perspectives of nursing professionals and older adults differ on aspects of care for older people after a nationwide improvement program.

Lisanne Marlieke Verweij, Rik Wehrens, Lieke Oldenhof, Roland Bal, Anneke L Francke

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisanne Marlieke VerweijNetherlands Institute of Health Services Research (NIVEL), Otterstraat 118-124, 3513, CR, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Rik WehrensErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lieke OldenhofErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Roland BalErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anneke L FranckeNetherlands Institute of Health Services Research (NIVEL), Otterstraat 118-124, 3513, CR, Utrecht, the Netherlands. a.francke@nivel.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe perspectives of nursing professionals might differ from those of older adults when it comes to care for older people. This cross-sectional study compares the views of older adults with the views of nursing professionals on the quality of care after a nationwide improvement program for care for older people was implemented (2008-2016) in the Netherlands.

methodsQuestionnaire data were used from 385 nursing professionals (response rate 51%) that were part of the Nursing Staff Panel, a nationwide representative group of nursing staff, and working in home care, hospitals or general practices. Additionally, questionnaire data were used from 73 older adults (response rate 81%) who were involved in regional networks to discuss project proposals and to represent the voice of older adults in the nationwide improvement program. Participants were asked to evaluate care for older people with regard to collaboration between healthcare organizations and with regard to the tailored service, accessibility, and quality of care within their organizations and in the region in which they lived.

resultsA majority of older adults (54%) and nursing professionals (61%) felt that collaboration with others had improved over the last few years. Approximately one third of the older adults stated that care for older people was tailored to fit individual needs and was accessible most of the time or always, as opposed to approximately two thirds of the professionals. Moreover, 17% older adults thought that the quality of care was good, compared with 54% of the nursing professionals. 77% of the nursing professionals and 94% of the older adults thought that improvements were still needed in care for older people, for example better integration of the different aspects of care and a more patient-centered approach.

conclusionOlder adults who were involved in networks of the improvement program generally gave a less positive evaluation of aspects of care for older people and its development than nursing professionals. Considering differences in the perspectives of key stakeholders is relevant for the development and evaluation of nationwide improvement programs, for a correct interpretation of findings, and for making appropriate recommendations.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Services for the AgedHome Care ServicesNursesAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPatient ParticipationPatient SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesNational improvement programNursing professionalsOlder personsPerspectives

Identifiers

PMID29720165
PMCPMC5932835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.