Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29720083›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2018

General practitioners' attitudes towards patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study.

Anja Wollny, Michael Pentzek, Oliver Rudolf Herber, Heinz-Harald Abholz, Jürgen In der Schmitten, Andrea Icks, Stefan Wilm, Elisabeth Gummersbach

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anja WollnyInstitute of General Practice, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Michael PentzekInstitute of General Practice (ifam), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany. pentzek@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Oliver Rudolf HerberInstitute of General Practice (ifam), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Heinz-Harald AbholzInstitute of General Practice (ifam), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Jürgen In der SchmittenInstitute of General Practice (ifam), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Andrea IcksInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Stefan WilmInstitute of General Practice (ifam), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Elisabeth GummersbachInstitute of General Practice (ifam), Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Werdener Str. 4, 40227, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with poor glycaemic control can represent a challenge from the perspective of the general practitioner (GP). Apart from patient-sided factors, the understanding of GPs' attitudes may provide ideas for improved management in these patients. The aim of this study is to reveal attitudes of GPs towards T2DM patients with poor metabolic control.

methodsQualitative research in German general practice; 20 GPs, randomly chosen from participants of a larger study; in-depth narrative interviews, audio-recorded and transcribed; inductive coding and categorisation in a multi-professional team; abstraction of major themes in terms of attitudinal responses.

results1) Orientation on laboratory parameters: GPs see it as their medical responsibility to achieve targets, which instil a sense of security. 2) Resignation: GPs believe their efforts are in vain and see their role as being undermined. 3) Devaluation of the patient: GPs blame the "non-compliance" of the patients and experience care as a series of conflicts. 4) Fixed role structure: The expert GP on the one hand, the ignorant patient on the other. 5) Solidarity with the patient: GPs appreciate a doctor-patient relationship in terms of partnership.

conclusionsThe conflict GPs experience between their sense of duty and feelings of futility may lead to perceptions such as personal defeat and insecurity. GPs (and patients) may benefit from adjusting the patient-doctor relationship with regard to shared definitions of realistic and authentic goals.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGeneral PractitionersPatient CompliancePhysician-Patient RelationsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGermanyHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchAttitude of health personnelDiabetes mellitusGeneral practicePhysician-patient relationsQualitative researchType 2

Identifiers

PMID29720083
PMCPMC5932823
OpenAlexW2807495621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.