Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29719699›Full record

ArticleChemical science2018

The TensorMol-0.1 model chemistry: a neural network augmented with long-range physics.

Kun Yao, John E Herr, David W Toth, Ryker Mckintyre, John Parkhill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Simultaneous learning of static and dynamic charges.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kun YaoDept. of Chemistry and Biochemistry , The University of Notre Dame du Lac , USA . Email: john.parkhill@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2032-7441
John E HerrDept. of Chemistry and Biochemistry , The University of Notre Dame du Lac , USA . Email: john.parkhill@gmail.com.
David W TothDept. of Chemistry and Biochemistry , The University of Notre Dame du Lac , USA . Email: john.parkhill@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1396-6165
Ryker MckintyreDept. of Chemistry and Biochemistry , The University of Notre Dame du Lac , USA . Email: john.parkhill@gmail.com.
John ParkhillDept. of Chemistry and Biochemistry , The University of Notre Dame du Lac , USA . Email: john.parkhill@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5739-9620

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional force fields cannot model chemical reactivity, and suffer from low generality without re-fitting. Neural network potentials promise to address these problems, offering energies and forces with near

Identifiers

PMID29719699
PMCPMC5897848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.