Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29719551›Full record

ArticleInterventional neurology2018

Importance of Reperfusion Status after Intra-Arterial Thrombectomy for Prediction of Outcome in Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Stroke.

Luuk Dekker, Victor J Geraedts, Hajo Hund, Suzanne C Cannegieter, Raul G Nogueira, Mayank Goyal, Ido R van den Wijngaard

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Is a picture-perfect thrombectomy necessary in acute ischemic stroke?Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. qTICI: Quantitative assessment of brain tissue reperfusion on digital subtraction angiograms of acute ischemic stroke patients.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Luuk DekkerDepartment of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Victor J GeraedtsDepartment of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Hajo HundDepartment of Radiology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Suzanne C CannegieterDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Raul G NogueiraDepartment of Neurology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Mayank GoyalDepartment of Neurosciences, Radiology and Community Health Services, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Ido R van den WijngaardDepartment of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Medisch Centrum Haaglanden · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLEmory University · USUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReperfusion status after intra-arterial thrombectomy (IAT) is a critical predictor of functional outcome after acute ischemic stroke. However, most prognostic models have not included a detailed assessment of reperfusion status after IAT.

objectiveThe aim of this work was to assess the association between successful reperfusion and clinical outcome.

methodsClinical, radiological, and procedural variables of patients treated with IAT were extracted from our prospective stroke registry. The association with functional outcome using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) after 3 months was assessed using multivariable logistic regression. An extension of the modified TICI score, eTICI, was used to classify reperfusion status. The prognostic value of reperfusion status after IAT in addition to age, stroke severity, imaging characteristics, treatment with intravenous thrombolysis, and time from symptom onset to the end of IAT was assessed with logistic regression and summarized with receiver operating characteristic curves.

resultsIn total, 119 patients were included (mean age 66 years). In multivariable analysis, age >80 years (OR 6.8, 95% CI 1.2-39.8), NIHSS at presentation >15 (OR 7.3, 95% CI 2.3-23.5), and incomplete reperfusion status (eTICI score <2C; OR 10.3, 95% CI 3.5-30.6) were the strongest predictors of a poor outcome (mRS 3-6). Adding reperfusion status to the model improved the prognostic accuracy (AUC 0.88, 95% CI 0.91-0.94). Our results indicate a large difference between using an eTICI cutoff of ≥2C versus ≥2B: a cutoff ≥2C improved the predictive value for a good clinical outcome (2C: positive predictive value, PPV, 0.78; 2B: PPV 0.32).

conclusionOur results promote using reperfusion status for assessing prognosis in ischemic stroke patients treated with IAT. A model using eTICI ≥2C had greater PPV than eTICI ≥2B and could improve prognostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Intra-arterial thrombectomyIschemic strokePredictorPrognosisReperfusion

Identifiers

PMID29719551
PMCPMC5921183
OpenAlexW2794416113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.