Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29719442›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2018

Ataxia-telangiectasia gene (

K J Jerzak, T Mancuso, A Eisen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Multigene panel testing reveals the spectrum of non-BRCA germline variants in BRCA1/2-negative breast, ovarian, and prostate cancer patients from a Turkish cohort.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A NovelHuman mutation · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K J JerzakDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
T MancusoDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
A EisenDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON.
University of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the fact that heterozygosity for a pathogenic Methods: In this narrative review, we describe the challenges and controversies in the management of women who are heterozygous for a pathogenic Results: Given that the lifetime risk for breast cancer in women who are heterozygous for a pathogenic Conclusions: As in the 2017 U.S. National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, we recommend high-risk imaging for women in Ontario who are heterozygous for a pathogenic

Indexed as

MutationAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsBreast NeoplasmsClinical Decision-MakingEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHeterozygoteHumansNeoplasm ProteinsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanNeoplasm Proteinsataxia–telangiectasiabreast cancergene panel assaysGenetic testing

Identifiers

PMID29719442
PMCPMC5927797
OpenAlexW2802816227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.