ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2018
Prediction of tumor mutation burden in breast cancer based on the expression of ER, PR, HER-2, and Ki-67.
Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- The GAPP Aggressivity Score Correlates with Total Enriched Somatic Variant Burden in Sporadic Pheochromocytoma-A Pilot Study.Cancers · 2026Article
- Next-Generation Sequencing and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Insights and Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Deep learning-based immunohistochemical estimation of breast cancer via ultrasound image applications.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Liquid biopsy biomarkers to guide immunotherapy in breast cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Artificial intelligence scale-invariant feature transform algorithm-based system to improve the calculation accuracy of Ki-67 index in invasive breast cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Radiogenomics for Cancers in the Era of Precision Medicine.Cancers · 2022Review
- Weighted Gene Coexpression Network Analysis Identifies TBC1D10C as a New Prognostic Biomarker for Breast Cancer.Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2022Article
- Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in estrogen receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2021Article
- Tumor Mutation Burden Prediction Model in Egyptian Breast Cancer patients based on Next Generation Sequencing.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021Article
- Optimisation and validation of immunohistochemistry protocols for cancer research.Histology and histopathology · 2021Article
- Associations of Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, Human Epidemic Growth Factor Receptor-2 and Ki-67 with Ultrasound Signs and Prognosis of Breast Cancer Patients.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
- Predictive Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Breast Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- Review
- The mutational landscape of the SCAN-B real-world primary breast cancer transcriptome.EMBO molecular medicine · 2020Article
- PEG3 mutation is associated with elevated tumor mutation burden and poor prognosis in breast cancer.Bioscience reports · 2020Article
- Breast cancer immunology and immunotherapy: targeting the programmed cell death protein-1/programmed cell death protein ligand-1.Chinese medical journal · 2020Review
- Biologically Aggressive Phenotype and Anti-cancer Immunity Counterbalance in Breast Cancer with High Mutation Rate.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Elevated tumor mutation burden and immunogenic activity in patients with hormone receptor-negative or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer.Oncology letters · 2019Article
- Immunotherapy in breast cancer.Journal of carcinogenesis · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCancer immunoediting is the process of eliminating highly immunogenic tumor cells by somatic evolution and protecting the host from tumor development in the host immune system. Frequencies of somatic mutations or tumor mutation burden (TMB) were associated with immunogenicity of breast cancer. This study aimed to predict the level of TMB in patients with breast cancer by the expression of estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), HER-2, and Ki-67, thereby anticipating the prognosis of patients and the possible response to immunotherapy. PATIENTS AND
methodsIn 53 patients with breast cancer, the 453 multigenes panel based on NGS was used to determine the TMB value of breast cancer in the patient's primary tumor tissues. The predicted TMB value was divided into 4 groups: A (0-3.33), B (3.33-5.56), C (5.56-8.89), and D (>8.89), according to the quartile method, with group A as reference level. Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk ratio of each molecule type, and the prediction model was established. Survival probabilities by covariates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimator survival analysis and Cox's proportional hazards models.
resultsIn 53 patients, the TMB value measured by the NGS polygenic panel was between 0 and 14.4/Mb. TMB distribution in 53 cases of breast cancer tissue: 18 cases in A group, 22 cases in B group, 10 cases in C group, and 3 cases in D group. HER-2 expression positivity was significantly associated with TMB (HER-2 positive vs HER-2 negative, odds ratio [OR] =34.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.711-821.689,
conclusionThe preliminary results suggest that the level of TMB value in patients with breast cancer can be predicted based on the expression levels of ER, PR, HER-2, and Ki-67, which may indicate the prognostic and predictive value of immunotherapy in patients with breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.