Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29719379›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2018

Comparison of tadalafil pharmacokinetics after administration of a new orodispersible film versus a film-coated tablet.

Sang-In Park, Su-Hak Heo, Gihwan Kim, Seokhoon Chang, Keon-Hyoung Song, Min-Gul Kim, Eun-Heui Jin, JaeWoo Kim, SeungHwan Lee, Jang Hee Hong

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Novel Emerging Therapies for Erectile Dysfunction.The world journal of men's health · 2021
    Review
  6. Development of spray-dried amorphous solid dispersions of tadalafil using glycyrrhizin for enhanced dissolution and aphrodisiac activity in male rats.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sang-In Park *Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Su-Hak Heo *R&D Center, C.L. Pharm Co., Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Gihwan KimR&D Center, C.L. Pharm Co., Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seokhoon ChangR&D Center, C.L. Pharm Co., Ltd, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Keon-Hyoung SongDepartment of Pharmaceutical Engineering, College of Medical Science, Soonchunhyang University, Asan, Republic of Korea.
Min-Gul KimDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Eun-Heui JinClinical Trials Center, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
JaeWoo KimClinical Trials Center, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
SeungHwan LeeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seoul National University College of Medicine and Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jang Hee HongClinical Trials Center, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn orodispersible film (ODF) of tadalafil may provide increased convenience for erectile dysfunction (ED) patients as compared to conventional tablet formulations. In this study, we aimed to compare the pharmacokinetic, safety, and tolerability profiles of a newly developed ODF formulation of tadalafil to those of a film-coated tablet (FCT) of tadalafil. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study was conducted in healthy male subjects using an open-label, randomized sequence, two-period, two-formulation, single-dose, crossover design. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of two sequences of the two formulations: both the test drug (ODF) and the reference drug (FCT) contained 20 mg of tadalafil. Blood samples were collected up to 72 h after administration. Plasma concentrations of tadalafil were analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of the ODF to FCT formulations and their 90% CIs for the pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study.

resultsForty healthy male subjects were enrolled, and 36 of these completed the study. The GMRs (90% CIs) of the maximum plasma concentration and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration for tadalafil were 0.927 (0.882-0.974) and 0.972 (0.918-1.029), respectively. Both ODF and FCT formulations were well tolerated, and no clinically significant changes from the baseline were observed after dosing.

conclusionThe pharmacokinetics of the tadalafil ODF formulation did not differ significantly from those of the FCT formulation. Furthermore, the safety and tolerability profiles of the ODF formulation were comparable to those of the FCT formulation. Therefore, this tadalafil ODF formulation offers a convenient treatment option for patients with erectile dysfunction.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultChromatography, LiquidCross-Over StudiesDrug ToleranceHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedTabletsTadalafilTandem Mass SpectrometryYoung AdultTabletsTadalafilerectile dysfunctionorodispersible filmpharmacokineticstadalafil

Identifiers

PMID29719379
PMCPMC5916261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.