Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29718969›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Is prevention better than cure? A systematic review of the effectiveness of well-being interventions for military personnel adjusting to civilian life.

Andreas Bauer, Dorothy Newbury-Birch, Shannon Robalino, Jennifer Ferguson, Sarah Wigham

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare students.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Returning home from a full-scale armed conflict: A rapid review of short post-deployment psychological practices.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The enduring well-being impacts of attending the Battle Back Multi Activity Course for the lives of recovering UK armed forces personnel.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Resiliency to adversity in military personnel: The role of self-regulation.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andreas BauerInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Dorothy Newbury-BirchSchool of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Teesside, United Kingdom.
Shannon RobalinoInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Jennifer FergusonSchool of Health and Social Care, Teesside University, Teesside, United Kingdom.
Sarah WighamInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7722-9108

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exposure to stressful and potentially traumatic experiences is a risk for military personnel and for some this may increase susceptibility to reduced well-being. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the effectiveness of interventions to promote the well-being of military personnel adjusting to civilian life. Electronic databases were searched including MEDLINE, Embase, HMIC, PsycINFO, Pilots and CINAHL. Twelve articles, all conducted in the USA, were included in the review. Articles were synthesised narratively and assessed for bias against established criteria. The studies evaluated the effectiveness of interventions for current and former military personnel. The interventions included expressive writing, anger management, cognitive training, psycho-education, and techniques to promote relaxation, connection in relationships and resilience. Interventions had some significant positive effects mostly for veterans adjusting to civilian life and other family members. There was much heterogeneity in the design and the outcome measures used in the studies reviewed. The review highlights the need for future robust trials examining the effectiveness of well-being interventions in military groups with diverse characteristics; in addition qualitative research to explore a conceptualisation of well-being for this group and the acceptability of interventions which may be perceived as treatment. The results of the review will be of interest to a number of stakeholders in military, public health and mental health settings. PROSPERO Registration number: CRD42015026341.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalMental HealthHumansMilitary Personnel

Identifiers

PMID29718969
PMCPMC5931793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.