Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29718930›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Emergence of highly prevalent CA-MRSA ST93 as an occupational risk in people working on a pig farm in Australia.

Shafi Sahibzada, Marta Hernández-Jover, David Jordan, Peter C Thomson, Jane Heller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Application of Markov models to predict changes in nasal carriage ofJournal of occupational and environmental hygiene · 2022
    Article
  4. Ecology and Genetic Lineages of NasalPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Acquisition Risk Factors of the SCCAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Challenges in Estimating Characteristics ofFrontiers in public health · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shafi SahibzadaSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7362-8323
Marta Hernández-JoverSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
David JordanNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Wollongbar, NSW, Australia.
Peter C ThomsonGraham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Jane HellerSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia.
Charles Sturt University · AUNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe occurrence of livestock-associated (LA) MRSA (ST398) in pig herds has emerged as a threat to occupational safety in many parts of the world. Recently, an outbreak of skin lesions due to MRSA occurred in workers at a pig farm in regional Australia and both the humans and pigs were shown to have a high prevalence of carriage of either the human-strain ST93 or porcine strain ST398. This study closely scrutinises this outbreak to determine factors associated with MRSA carriage amongst the workers.

methodsInformation on potential risk factors was collected from employees by means of a questionnaire. The carriage status of MRSA by workers was assessed by nasal swabs processed using standard laboratory techniques with confirmed isolates subjected to sequence typing. Associations between MRSA carriage in workers and their questionnaire responses were investigated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression.

resultsNasal carriage of MRSA was identified in 60% (31/52) of participants. Workers having contact with pigs had 24 times the odds of MRSA carriage compared to workers with no direct contact (OR 23.6; CI 5.2-172.8). In addition, the probability of MRSA carriage in workers was significantly (P < 0.001) associated with the number of hours in contact with pigs and each hour of contact-time per day increased the risk of MRSA carriage by 1.44 times (CI 1.14-1.96). These associations were significant (P < 0.001) for both strains, ST398 and ST93, present on this farm. Using a multivariable logistic regression model that incorporated human exposure to five different pig age groups (dry sows, farrowing, weaner, grower, and finisher) as fixed effects, a significant (P = 0.027) increased odds of MRSA carriage was found for persons working with farrowing sows compared with those who did not (OR 6.39, CI 1.23-39.36).

conclusionsThis study shows that workers in close contact with pigs on a pig farm where MRSA is present had a higher risk of MRSA carriage as the number of hours of direct contact with pigs increased. Since we have detected a significant association for the human-derived CA-MRSA ST93, similar to the pig-adapted LA-MRSA ST398, we consider ST93 as a potential occupational risk for piggery workers. The risk of MRSA carriage is greatest when working with the farrowing group; therefore, an emphasis is required on personal protective equipment while working in the farrowing house. The study has ramifications for the conduct of surveillance for MRSA in people exposed to pigs.

Indexed as

FarmsSwineAdultAnimalsAustraliaFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansHygieneMaleMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusOccupational ExposurePrevalenceRiskSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID29718930
PMCPMC5931470
OpenAlexW2799779902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.