Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29718920›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2018

Placental cord drainage in the third stage of labor: Randomized clinical trial.

Fernanda Barros Vasconcelos, Leila Katz, Isabela Coutinho, Vanessa Laranjeiras Lins, Melania Maria de Amorim

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01655576 nacompletednot on this map

Effectiveness of Placental Drainage in the Third Stage of Labor: a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Materno Infantil Prof. Fernando FigueiraRan2012 to 2013Enrolled226ConditionsManagement of DeliveryArmsPlacental drainage
NCT05610345 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Placental Cord Drainage on Postpartum Blood Loss

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TennesseeRan2022 to 2023Enrolled71ConditionsPostpartum HemorrhageArmsPlacental Blood Drainage, Placenta Blood Not Drained
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fernanda Barros VasconcelosDepartment of Obstetrics, Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Leila KatzDepartment of Obstetrics, Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Isabela CoutinhoDepartment of Obstetrics, Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Vanessa Laranjeiras LinsDepartment of Obstetrics, Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.
Melania Maria de AmorimDepartment of Obstetrics, Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

methodsAn open randomized clinical trial was developed at Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira (IMIP) in Recife and at Petronila Campos Municipal Hospital in São Lourenço da Mata, both in Pernambuco, northeastern Brazil, including 226 low-risk pregnant women bearing a single, full-term, live fetus after delayed cord clamping, 113 randomized to placental cord drainage and 113 to a control group not submitted to this procedure. Women incapable of understanding the study objectives and those who went on to have an instrumental or cesarean delivery were excluded.

resultsDuration of the third stage of labor did not differ between the two groups (14.2±12.9 versus 13.7±12.1 minutes (mean ± SD), p = 0.66). Likewise, there was no significant difference in mean blood loss (248±254 versus 208±187ml, p = 0.39) or in postpartum hematocrit levels (32.3±4.06 versus 32.8±4.25mg/dl, p = 0.21). Furthermore, no differences were found between the groups for any of the secondary outcomes (postpartum hemorrhage >500 or >1000ml, therapeutic use of oxytocin, third stage >30 or 60 minutes, digital evacuation of the uterus or curettage, symptoms of postpartum anemia and maternal satisfaction).

conclusionPlacental cord drainage had no effect in reducing duration or blood loss during the third stage of labor. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: www.clinicaltrial.gov, NCT01655576.

Indexed as

Labor, ObstetricAdultConstrictionFemaleHumansPostpartum HemorrhagePregnancyUmbilical CordYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29718920
PMCPMC5931461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.