ArticlePloS one2018
Impact of smoking on stroke outcome after endovascular treatment.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of smoking on outcomes following endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026Pooled it
- Trial
- Relative Hypotension is Not Associated with Rapid Progressor Phenotype in Anterior Circulation Large-Vessel Occlusion Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cerebrovascular diseases extra · 2025Article
- Impact of smoking status and smoking index on outcomes in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Effect of smoking status on clinical outcomes after reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Clinical predictors of prognosis in stroke patients after endovascular therapy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Smoke Signals: Unraveling the Paradoxical Impact of Smoking on Stroke Prognosis and Treatment Efficacy.Cureus · 2024Review
- Machine learning to predict futile recanalization of large vessel occlusion before and after endovascular thrombectomy.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Effects of Smoking on Very-Long Term Mortality after First ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2022Article
- Impact of Stroke Severity on the Smoking Paradox in Patients Treated with Intravenous Thrombolysis.Current neurovascular research · 2022Article
- Cerebrovascular accidents differ between patients with atrial flutter and patients with atrial fibrillation.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2021Article
- Serum immunoglobulin G antibody titer to Fusobacterium nucleatum is associated with unfavorable outcome after stroke.Clinical and experimental immunology · 2020Article
- Smoking Does Not Alter Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Mild to Moderate Acute Ischemic Stroke-A Dutch String-of-Pearls Institute (PSI) Stroke Study.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- Current Smoking Does Not Modify the Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients-AFrontiers in neurology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecent studies suggest a paradoxical association between smoking status and clinical outcome after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Little is known about relationship between smoking and stroke outcome after endovascular treatment (EVT).
methodsWe analyzed data of all stroke patients treated with EVT at the tertiary stroke centre of Berne between January 2005 and December 2015. Using uni- and multivariate modeling, we assessed whether smoking was independently associated with excellent clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1) and mortality at 3 months. In addition, we also measured the occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and recanalization.
resultsOf 935 patients, 204 (21.8%) were smokers. They were younger (60.5 vs. 70.1 years of age, p<0.001), more often male (60.8% vs. 52.5%, p = 0.036), had less often from hypertension (56.4% vs. 69.6%, p<0.001) and were less often treated with antithrombotics (35.3% vs. 47.7%, p = 0.004) as compared to nonsmokers. In univariate analyses, smokers had higher rates of excellent clinical outcome (39.1% vs. 23.1%, p<0.001) and arterial recanalization (85.6% vs. 79.4%, p = 0.048), whereas mortality was lower (15.6% vs. 25%, p = 0.006) and frequency of sICH similar (4.4% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.86). After correcting for confounders, smoking still independently predicted excellent clinical outcome (OR 1.758, 95% CI 1.206-2.562; p<0.001).
conclusionSmoking in stroke patients may be a predictor of excellent clinical outcome after EVT. However, these data must not be misinterpreted as beneficial effect of smoking due to the observational study design. In view of deleterious effects of cigarette smoking on cardiovascular health, cessation of smoking should still be strongly recommended for stroke prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.