ArticleMedicine2018
Secondary pregnancy by an implant in a laparoscopic trocar site: A case report.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Complications in laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery: definitions, classifications, incidence and risk factors - an up-to-date review.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleFor nearly 20 years, laparoscopy has been generally regarded as the gold standard for the surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy and its application is very widespread. According to our knowledge, secondary pregnancy at the laparoscopic trocar site has not yet been reported until now. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 24-year-old Chinese female patient is reported herein. Her left fallopian tube was removed via laparoscopy due to a first ectopic pregnancy. Her postoperative blood β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) was increasing with irregular vaginal bleeding. The patient was initially regarded as having an old ectopic pregnancy. DIAGNOSES: Secondary pregnancy by an implant in a laparoscopic trocar Site.
interventionsBecause of secondary pregnancy at the laparoscopic port site, laparoscopic surgery was performed again 32 days after the first operation. Approximately 1000 milliliters (mL) of free intraperitoneal hemorrhage and active bleeding of the lesion were detected. Histopathologic examination confirmed the lesion was the result of pregnancy with visible villous tissue. OUTCOMES: Her blood β-hCG gradually declined to a normal range in 28 days after the second operation. Menstruation occurred on day 20 after the second operation, and the duration and quantity were normal. LESSONS: Although laparoscopy has many advantages, secondary pregnancy at the laparoscopic trocar port wound caused the patient enormous physical and mental pain and increased the medical costs. The etiology of secondary ectopic pregnancy at the laparoscopic puncture site was mainly an iatrogenic factor. Therefore, the procedure should be standardized to avoid its occurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.