Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29718565›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2018

Kidney offer acceptance at programs undergoing a Systems Improvement Agreement.

Mary G Bowring, Allan B Massie, Rebecca Craig-Schapiro, Dorry L Segev, Lauren Hersch Nicholas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Modest rates and wide variation in timely access to repeat kidney transplantation in the United States.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Reported effects of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients 5-tier rating system on US transplant centers: results of a national survey.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mary G BowringDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7299-7730
Allan B MassieDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5288-5125
Rebecca Craig-SchapiroDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Dorry L SegevDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1924-4801
Lauren Hersch NicholasDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0759-2849

Funding

Patient Oriented Research in Kidney Disease and Transplant SurgeryK24DK101828 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SEGEV, DORRY L. · 2014 to 2018
$922k
Determinants of chronic kidney disease in African-American live kidney donorsK01DK101677 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MASSIE, ALLAN B · 2015 to 2019
$789k
Geographic Variation in the Health and Economic Determinants and Outcomes of ElecK01AG041763 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NICHOLAS, LAUREN HERSCH · 2012 to 2016
$622k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG041763NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK101677NIDDK NIH HHS K24 DK101828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the United States, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) use Systems Improvement Agreements (SIAs) to require transplant programs repeatedly flagged for poor-performance to improve performance or lose CMS funding for transplants. We identified 14 kidney transplant (KT) programs with SIAs and 28 KT programs without SIAs matched on waitlist volume and characterized kidney acceptance using SRTR data from 12/2006-3/2015. We used difference-in-differences linear regression models to identify changes in acceptance associated with an SIA independent of program variation and trends prior to the SIA. SIA programs accepted 26.9% and 22.1% of offers pre- and post-SIA, while non-SIA programs accepted 33.9% and 44.4% of offers in matched time periods. After adjustment for donor characteristics, time-varying waitlist volume, and secular trends, SIAs were associated with a 5.9 percentage-point (22%) decrease in kidney acceptance (95% CI: -10.9 to -0.8, P = .03). The decrease in acceptance post-SIA was more pronounced for KDPI 0-40 kidneys (12.3 percentage-point decrease, P = .007); reductions in acceptance of higher KDPI kidneys occurred pre-SIA. Programs undergoing SIAs substantially reduced acceptance of kidney offers for waitlisted candidates. Attempts to improve posttransplant outcomes might have the unintended consequence of reducing access to transplantation as programs adopt more restrictive organ selection practices.

Indexed as

Donor SelectionCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.Decision Support Systems, ClinicalHumansKidney TransplantationPrognosisRegistriesSurvival RateTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsUnited StatesWaiting Listsclinical decision-makingclinical research/practiceethics and public policykidney transplantation/nephrologyorgan acceptanceorgan procurement and allocationOrgan Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN)Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients (SRTR)

Identifiers

PMID29718565
PMCPMC6117205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.