Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29718421›Full record

Trial reportRheumatology (Oxford, England)2018

Tofacitinib is associated with attainment of the minimally important reduction in axial magnetic resonance imaging inflammation in ankylosing spondylitis patients.

Walter P Maksymowych, Désirée van der Heijde, Xenofon Baraliakos, Atul Deodhar, Sarah P Sherlock, David Li, Dona Fleishaker, Thijs Hendrikx, Keith S Kanik

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. La Tunisie medicale · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. JAK Inhibitors for the Treatment of Axial Spondyloarthritis.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Walter P MaksymowychDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Désirée van der HeijdeDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Xenofon BaraliakosRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany.
Atul DeodharDivision of Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
Sarah P SherlockPfizer Inc, Cambridge, MA.
David LiPfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA.
Dona FleishakerPfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA.
Thijs HendrikxPfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA.
Keith S KanikPfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Minimally important changes (MICs) for SPondyloArthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) MRI scores are ⩾2.5 for SI joint and ⩾5 for spine. This post hoc analysis assessed achievement of MIC in SPARCC scores in biologic-naïve patients with AS treated with tofacitinib or placebo, and correlation with clinical responses. Methods: Adult AS patients in a 12-week phase 2 study (n = 207) were randomized 1: 1: 1: 1 to tofacitinib 2, 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID) or placebo. MIC in SPARCC SI joint and spine scores were assessed for patients with available MRI data (N = 164; 79%). Clinical endpoints at week 12, including Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society 20% improvement (ASAS20), were compared between patients achieving/not achieving MIC. Results: A greater proportion of patients achieved MIC with tofacitinib 2, 5 and 10 mg BID vs placebo for SI joint (28.6, 38.6, 29.6 vs 11.8%) and spine scores (29.3, 36.4, 40.9 vs 11.8%). Generally, a greater proportion of patients treated with tofacitinib 2, 5 and 10 mg BID or placebo, respectively, who achieved MIC for SI joint and spine scores achieved ASAS20 (SI joint: 75.0, 88.2, 69.2, 75.0%; spine: 91.7, 85.7, 72.2, 75.0%) vs patients who did not achieve MIC (SI joint: 51.7, 84.0, 58.1, 48.3%; spine: 46.4, 85.7, 53.8, 48.3%). Numerically greater responses were seen in those patients achieving vs not achieving MIC across a range of other efficacy assessments. Conclusion: Approximately one-third of tofacitinib-treated AS patients experienced clinically meaningful reductions in spinal MRI inflammation at week 12. Patients achieving MIC for MRI inflammation had greater clinical response.

Indexed as

AdultDisease ProgressionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansJanus Kinase 3Magnetic Resonance ImagingMalePiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesPyrrolesSeverity of Illness IndexSpondylitis, AnkylosingThoracic VertebraeTreatment OutcomeJanus Kinase 3PiperidinesProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesPyrrolestofacitinib

Identifiers

PMID29718421
PMCPMC6055606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.