Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29718329›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2018

Antimicrobial susceptibility and ribotypes of Clostridium difficile isolates from a Phase 2 clinical trial of ridinilazole (SMT19969) and vancomycin.

David R Snydman, Laura A McDermott, Cheleste M Thorpe, Justin Chang, Jenna Wick, Seth T Walk, Richard J Vickers

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02092935 (A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Clinical Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of SMT19969 Compared With Vancomycin for the Treatment of Clostridium Difficile-Associated Diarrhoea), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02092935 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Clinical Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of SMT19969 Compared With Vancomycin for the Treatment of Clostridium Difficile-Associated Diarrhoea (CDAD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSummit TherapeuticsRan2014 to 2015Enrolled100ConditionsClostridium Difficile InfectionArmsSMT19969, Vancomycin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reduced Vancomycin Susceptibility in Clostridioides difficile Is Associated With Lower Rates of Initial Cure and Sustained Clinical Response.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The Novel DNA Binding Mechanism of Ridinilazole, a PrecisionAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2023
    Article
  7. Can Clostridium innocuum Masquerade as Clostridioides difficile?Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Investigational Treatment Agents for RecurrentJournal of experimental pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  10. PCR ribotypes ofEmerging microbes & infections · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Ridinilazole: a novel antimicrobial forAnnals of gastroenterology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

David R SnydmanDivision of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases and Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Laura A McDermottDivision of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases and Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Cheleste M ThorpeDivision of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases and Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Justin ChangDivision of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases and Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Jenna WickDivision of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases and Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Seth T WalkDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Richard J VickersSummit Therapeutics Plc, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK.
Tufts Medical Center · USTufts University · USMontana State University · USSummit (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 099444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: We evaluated the antimicrobial susceptibility and ribotypes of Clostridium difficile isolates from participants in a Phase 2 study of ridinilazole, a novel targeted-spectrum agent for treatment of C. difficile infection. Methods: Participants received ridinilazole (200 mg twice daily) or vancomycin (125 mg four times daily) for 10 days (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02092935). The MICs of ridinilazole and comparators for C. difficile isolates from stool samples were determined by agar dilution. Toxin gene profiling was performed by multiplex PCR and ribotype identification by capillary electrophoresis. Results: Eighty-nine isolates were recovered from 88/100 participants (one participant had two strains at baseline). The median colony count (cfu/g stool) was 1.9 × 104 (range: 2.5 × 102-7.0 × 106). Twelve participants (three received ridinilazole and nine received vancomycin) experienced recurrence, confirmed by immunoassays for free toxin in stool samples. The ribotype of eight out of nine isolates obtained at recurrence matched those of the initial isolates. All isolates, including those obtained at recurrence, were susceptible to ridinilazole within the expected range [median (range) MIC: 0.12 (0.06-0.5) mg/L]. The median (range) vancomycin MIC was 1 (0.5-4.0) mg/L. At baseline, 13.6% and 13.3% of samples in the ridinilazole and vancomycin groups were positive for VRE, increasing to 23.7% and 29.7% by day 40, respectively. Common ribotypes included 014-20 (14 isolates), 027 (13), 106 (7), 002 (7), 078-126 (4), 001 (4), 087 (3) and 198 (3). Toxin gene profiling of nearly all baseline isolates (98.9%) revealed a binary toxin gene (cdtA/cdtB) prevalence of 35%. Conclusions: Ridinilazole potently inhibited recovered C. difficile isolates. Recurrence was not associated with altered susceptibility.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBenzimidazolesClostridioides difficileClostridium InfectionsDouble-Blind MethodGenes, BacterialHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPyridinesRibotypingVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsBenzimidazolesPyridinesridinilazoleVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID29718329
PMCPMC6054158
OpenAlexW2799696102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.