ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2018
High precision in protein contact prediction using fully convolutional neural networks and minimal sequence features.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 80 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
80 citing papers in PubMed.
- AIP-TranLAC: A Transformer-Based Method Integrating LSTM and Attention Mechanism for Predicting Anti-inflammatory Peptides.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026Article
- MAKA-Map: Real-Valued Distance Prediction for Protein Folding Mechanisms via a Hybrid Neural Framework Integrating the Mamba and Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Protein Structure Prediction Methods.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Large language models in bioinformatics: a comprehensive survey.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Plasma proteins and herpes simplex virus infection: a proteome-wide Mendelian randomization study.Virus genes · 2025Article
- Emerging frontiers in protein structure prediction following the AlphaFold revolution.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Review
- Machine Learning Techniques to Infer Protein Structure and Function from Sequences: A Comprehensive Review.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Neural dynamics of delayed feedback in robot teleoperation: insights from fNIRS analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Article
- Beyond sequence: Structure-based machine learning.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Article
- DomainMapper: Accurate domain structure annotation including those with non-contiguous topologies.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022Article
- Improved Protein Real-Valued Distance Prediction Using Deep Residual Dense Network (DRDN).The protein journal · 2022Article
- Machine learning/molecular dynamic protein structure prediction approach to investigate the protein conformational ensemble.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- From systems to structure - using genetic data to model protein structures.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2022Review
- Structure-conditioned amino-acid couplings: How contact geometry affects pairwise sequence preferences.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022Article
- Deep learning methods for 3D structural proteome and interactome modeling.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022Review
- SPOT-Contact-LM: improving single-sequence-based prediction of protein contact map using a transformer language model.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Ultrafast end-to-end protein structure prediction enables high-throughput exploration of uncharacterized proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Refined Contact Map Prediction of Peptides Based on GCN and ResNet.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
20 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: In addition to substitution frequency data from protein sequence alignments, many state-of-the-art methods for contact prediction rely on additional sources of information, or features, of protein sequences in order to predict residue-residue contacts, such as solvent accessibility, predicted secondary structure, and scores from other contact prediction methods. It is unclear how much of this information is needed to achieve state-of-the-art results. Here, we show that using deep neural network models, simple alignment statistics contain sufficient information to achieve state-of-the-art precision. Our prediction method, DeepCov, uses fully convolutional neural networks operating on amino-acid pair frequency or covariance data derived directly from sequence alignments, without using global statistical methods such as sparse inverse covariance or pseudolikelihood estimation. Results: Comparisons against CCMpred and MetaPSICOV2 show that using pairwise covariance data calculated from raw alignments as input allows us to match or exceed the performance of both of these methods. Almost all of the achieved precision is obtained when considering relatively local windows (around 15 residues) around any member of a given residue pairing; larger window sizes have comparable performance. Assessment on a set of shallow sequence alignments (fewer than 160 effective sequences) indicates that the new method is substantially more precise than CCMpred and MetaPSICOV2 in this regime, suggesting that improved precision is attainable on smaller sequence families. Overall, the performance of DeepCov is competitive with the state of the art, and our results demonstrate that global models, which employ features from all parts of the input alignment when predicting individual contacts, are not strictly needed in order to attain precise contact predictions. Availability and implementation: DeepCov is freely available at https://github.com/psipred/DeepCov. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.