Observational studyJournal of neurotrauma2018
Age-Related Differences in Diagnostic Accuracy of Plasma Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Tau for Identifying Acute Intracranial Trauma on Computed Tomography: A TRACK-TBI Study.
Observational study in Journal of neurotrauma, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06163833 (MATRIx), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
MATRIx: MesenchymAl Stromal Cells for Traumatic bRain Injury
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- The diagnostic and prognostic value of glial fibrillary acidic protein in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023Pooled it
- S100B, GFAP, UCH-L1 and NSE as predictors of abnormalities on CT imaging following mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.Neurosurgical review · 2022Pooled it
- Ultrasensitive assays for detection of plasma tau and phosphorylated tau 181 in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational neurodegeneration · 2021Pooled it
- Blood-based biomarkers GFAP/UCH-L1 for the diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI): a single-center implementation experience.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Observational
- Blood biomarker outliers and clinical events during intensive care in patients with traumatic brain injury.Brain & spine · 2026Article
- Minimally Invasive and Proactive Approaches for Treatment of Acute Traumatic Brain Injury in Elderly Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Review
- Review
- Article
- Association of Blood-Based Biomarkers and 6-Month Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Mild TBI: A CENTER-TBI Analysis.Neurology · 2025Observational
- Brain injury biomarkers and applications in neurological diseases.Chinese medical journal · 2025Review
- Blood biomarkers to identify patients with different intracranial lesion combinations after traumatic brain injury.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Observational
- Confounding factors of the expression of mTBI biomarkers, S100B, GFAP and UCH-L1 in an aging population.Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine · 2024Article
- Plasma Biomarkers of Traumatic Brain Injury in Adolescents With Sport-Related Concussion.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Distinct Serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Neurofilament Light Time-Courses After Rapid Head Rotations.Journal of neurotrauma · 2024Article
- Chronic immunosuppression across 12 months and high ability of acute and subacute CNS-injury biomarker concentrations to identify individuals with complicated mTBI on acute CT and MRI.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2024Article
- Blood biomarkers for traumatic brain injury: A narrative review of current evidence.Brain & spine · 2024Review
- Preliminary Evaluation of the Scandinavian Guidelines for Initial Management of Minimal, Mild, and Moderate Head Injuries with Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein.Neurotrauma reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Plasma tau and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are promising biomarkers for identifying traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with intracranial trauma on computed tomography (CT). Accuracy in older adults with mild TBI (mTBI), the fastest growing TBI population, is unknown. Our aim was to assess for age-related differences in diagnostic accuracy of plasma tau and GFAP for identifying intracranial trauma on CT. Samples from 169 patients (age <40 years [n = 79], age 40-59 years [n = 60], age 60 years+ [n = 30]), a subset of patients from the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) Pilot study who presented with mTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13-15), received head CT, and consented to blood draw within 24 h of injury, were assayed for hyperphosphorylated-tau (P-tau), total-tau (T-tau; both via amplification-linked enhanced immunoassay using multi-arrayed fiberoptics), and GFAP (via sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). P-tau, T-tau, P-tau:T-tau ratio, and GFAP concentration were significantly associated with CT findings. Overall, discriminative ability declined with increasing age for all assays, but this decline was only statistically significant for GFAP (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]: old 0.73 [reference group; ref] vs. young 0.93 [p = 0.037] or middle-aged 0.92 [p = 0.0497]). P-tau concentration consistently showed the highest diagnostic accuracy across all age-groups (AUC: old 0.84 [ref] vs. young 0.95 [p = 0.274] or middle-aged 0.93 [p = 0.367]). Comparison of models including P-tau alone versus P-tau plus GFAP revealed significant added value of GFAP. In conclusion, the GFAP assay was less accurate for identifying intracranial trauma on CT among older versus younger mTBI patients. Mechanisms of this age-related difference, including role of assay methodology, specific TBI neuroanatomy, pre-existing conditions, and anti-thrombotic use, warrant further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.