ArticleSheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi2017
[A signature based on relative gene expression orderings for lung cancer diagnosis].
Article in Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional classifiers, such as support vector machine and Bayesian classifier, require data normalization for removing experimental batch effects, which limit their applications at the individual level. In this paper,we aim to build a classifier to distinguish lung cancer and non-cancer lung tissues(pneumonia and normal lung tissues).We identified gene pairs as signatures to build a classifier based on the within-sample relative expression orderings of gene pairs in a particular type of tissues(cancer or non-cancer). Using multiple independent datasets as the training data,including a total of 197 lung cancer cases and 189 non-cancer cases, we identified three gene pairs. Classifying a sample by the majority voting rule, the average accuracy reached 95.34% in the training data. Using multiple independent validation datasets, including a total of 251 lung cancer samples and 141 non-cancer samples without data normalization, the average accuracy was as high as 96.78%. The rank-based signature is robust against experimental batch effects and can be used to diagnose lung cancer using samples measured by different laboratories at the individual level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29717600PMC9935376What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.