ArticleSheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi2017
[Research on ground reaction forces and utilized coefficient of friction of turning gait].
Article in Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Utilized coefficient of friction(UCOF), which is calculated with ground reaction forces(GRF), is an effective factor to predict the possibility of slip. For researching the UCOF values of different turning strategies and then predicting the possibility of slip, this study selected 10 healthy young men to perform straight walking and 60° and 90°turning using two turning strategies(step turning and spin turning). ATMI force plate was used to collect the data of GRF,and then the UCOF values of different walking conditions were calculated. The study showed that difference of the medial-lateral force in different walking conditions was great; the slip possibility of turning was significantly greater than that of straight walking. For spin turn, turning angle had no significant effect on peak UCOF values. For step turn, the propulsive force decreased with the increase of turning angle, which caused a result that the peak UCOF values of 60° turn were significantly greater than that for 90° turn. This suggests that turning angle had little effect on possibility of slip of spin turning but great effect on that of step turning, and the greater angle led smaller possibility of slip.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29717587PMC9935363What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.