Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29717380›Full record

ReviewCurrent hypertension reports2018

Selective vs. Global Renal Denervation: a Case for Less Is More.

Marat Fudim, Asher A Sobotka, Yue-Hui Yin, Joanne W Wang, Howard Levin, Murray Esler, Jie Wang, Paul A Sobotka

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hypertension reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Overcoming variable response in renal denervation: Key strategies for reliable clinical implementation.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Review
  2. Aorticorenal ganglion ablation for blood pressure lowering in canine models.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Beyond the Anatomy of Renal Nerves: Functional Diversity of Renal Nerves.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Neuromodulation for the Treatment of Heart Rhythm Disorders.JACC. Basic to translational science · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Catheter-Based Renal Denervation for Hypertension.Current hypertension reports · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marat FudimDuke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Asher A SobotkaSt. Paul Academy and Summit School, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Yue-Hui YinThe 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqin, China.
Joanne W WangHorace Mann, Bronx, NY, USA.
Howard LevinCoridea, New York, NY, USA.
Murray EslerBaker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
Jie WangColumbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Paul A SobotkaRox Medical, Inc., San Clemente, CA, USA. sobotka@alumni.stanford.edu.

Funding

MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEART &VASCULAR DISEASEST32HL007101 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FREEDMAN, NEIL J. · 1985 to 2020
$9.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewReview the renal nerve anatomy and physiology basics and explore the concept of global vs. selective renal denervation (RDN) to uncover some of the fundamental limitations of non-targeted renal nerve ablation and the potential superiority of selective RDN. RECENT

findingsRecent trials testing the efficacy of RDN showed mixed results. Initial investigations targeted global RDN as a therapeutic goal. The repeat observation of heterogeneous response to RDN including non-responders with lack of a BP reduction, or even more unsettling, BP elevations after RDN has raised concern for the detrimental effects of unselective global RDN. Subsequent studies have suggested the presence of a heterogeneous fiber population and the potential utility of renal nerve stimulation to identify sympatho-stimulatory fibers or "hot spots." The recognition that RDN can produce heterogeneous afferent sympathetic effects both change therapeutic goals and revitalize the potential of therapeutic RDN to provide significant clinical benefits. Renal nerve stimulation has emerged as potential tool to identify sympatho-stimulatory fibers, avoid sympatho-inhibitory fibers, and thus guide selective RDN.

Indexed as

Blood PressureCatheter AblationDenervationHumansHypertensionKidneySympathectomyTreatment OutcomeHot spotsHypertensionNerve stimulationRenal denervationRenal nerves

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.