Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29717270›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2019

Biological and psychological mediators of the relationships between fat mass, fat-free mass and energy intake.

Mark Hopkins, Graham Finlayson, Cristiana Duarte, Catherine Gibbons, Alexandra M Johnstone, Stephen Whybrow, Graham W Horgan, John E Blundell, R James Stubbs

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. An adiposity force induces obesity in humans independently of a normal energy balance system-a thought experiment.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Fat-free mass and resting metabolic rate are determinants of energy intake: implications for a theory of appetite control.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Behaviour, energy balance, obesity and capitalism.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mark HopkinsSchool of Food Science and Nutrition, Faculty of Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. M.Hopkins@Leeds.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7655-0215
Graham FinlaysonSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Cristiana DuarteSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Catherine GibbonsSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Alexandra M JohnstoneRowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Stephen WhybrowRowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0120-6890
Graham W HorganBiomathematics and Statistics Scotland, Aberdeen, UK.
John E BlundellSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
R James StubbsSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile recent studies in humans indicate that fat-free mass (FFM) is closely associated with energy intake (EI) when in energy balance, associations between fat mass (FM) and EI are inconsistent.

objectivesThe present study used a cross-sectional design to examine the indirect and direct effects of FFM, FM and resting metabolic rate (RMR) on EI in individuals at or close to energy balance.

methodsData for 242 individuals (114 males; 128 females; BMI = 25.7 ± 4.9 kg/m

resultsAfter adjusting for age, sex and study, linear regression and mediation analyses indicated that the effect of FFM on EI was mediated by RMR (P < 0.05). FM also independently predicted EI, with path analysis indicating a positive indirect association (mediated by RMR; P < 0.05), and a stronger direct negative association (P < 0.05). Leptin, insulin and insulin resistance failed to predict EI, but cognitive restraint was a determinant of EI and partially mediated the association between FM and EI (P < 0.05).

conclusionsWhile the association between FFM and EI was mediated by RMR, FM influenced EI via two separate and opposing pathways; an indirect 'excitatory' effect (again, mediated by RMR), and a stronger direct 'inhibitory' effect. Psychological factors such as cognitive restraint remain robust predictors of EI when considered alongside physiological determinants of EI, and indeed, have the potential to play a mediating role in the overall expression of EI.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueAdultBasal MetabolismBody CompositionCross-Sectional StudiesDietEnergy IntakeFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.