ArticleScientific reports2018
Inferring a nonlinear biochemical network model from a heterogeneous single-cell time course data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of information flows in the RAS-MAPK system using transfer entropy measurements.eLife · 2025Article
- A mathematically rigorous algorithm to define, compute and assess relevance of the probable dissociation constants in characterizing a biochemical network.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- ReDirection: an R-package to compute the probable dissociation constant for every reaction of a user-defined biochemical network.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Article
- Single-Cell RNA Sequencing-Based Computational Analysis to Describe Disease Heterogeneity.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mathematical modeling and analysis of biochemical reaction networks are key routines in computational systems biology and biophysics; however, it remains difficult to choose the most valid model. Here, we propose a computational framework for data-driven and systematic inference of a nonlinear biochemical network model. The framework is based on the expectation-maximization algorithm combined with particle smoother and sparse regularization techniques. In this method, a "redundant" model consisting of an excessive number of nodes and regulatory paths is iteratively updated by eliminating unnecessary paths, resulting in an inference of the most likely model. Using artificial single-cell time-course data showing heterogeneous oscillatory behaviors, we demonstrated that this algorithm successfully inferred the true network without any prior knowledge of network topology or parameter values. Furthermore, we showed that both the regulatory paths among nodes and the optimal number of nodes in the network could be systematically determined. The method presented in this study provides a general framework for inferring a nonlinear biochemical network model from heterogeneous single-cell time-course data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.