Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29716701›Full record

ArticleIndian heart journal

Differences in symptoms and presentation delay times in myocardial infarction patients with and without diabetes: A cross-sectional study in Pakistan.

Saba Ahmed, Ariba Khan, Syed Ibaad Ali, Mohammad Saad, Hafsa Jawaid, Mahnoor Islam, Hanieya Saiyed, Sarosh Fatima, Aiman Khan, Maleeha A Basham and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Acute coronary syndrome treatment delay in low to middle-income countries: A systematic review.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Saba AhmedDow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ariba KhanDow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan. Electronic address: aribakhan18@hotmail.com.
Syed Ibaad AliDow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mohammad SaadDow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Hafsa JawaidDow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mahnoor IslamDow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Hanieya SaiyedDow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sarosh FatimaDow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Aiman KhanDow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Maleeha A BashamDow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Syeda Asfia HussainDow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Maheen AkhtarDow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Fatima KausarDow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Afshan HussainDow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Kaneez FatimaDow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Dow University of Health Sciences · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA short pre-hospital delay, from the onset of symptoms to rapid initiation of reperfusion therapy, is a crucial factor in determining prognosis of myocardial infarction (MI). The purpose of this study was to evaluate symptoms and presentation delay times in MI patients with and without diabetes.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted in 3 tertiary care hospitals of Pakistan over a period of 6 months. The study sample consisted of 280 consenting individuals diagnosed with ST-elevation MI (STEMI) or Non-ST elevation MI (NSTEMI), out of which 130 were diabetic and 150 were non-diabetic. Data was collected using a standardized questionnaire, investigating MI symptoms along with causes and duration of pre-hospital delay within 72hours of admission.

resultsNo significant difference was found in the intensity of chest pain between diabetics and non-diabetics. Atypical symptoms of MI such as anxiety (p<0.001), cold sweats (p=0.034) and epigastric pain (p=0.017) were more frequently reported in diabetics. MI patients with diabetes had a significantly longer presentation delay time with 75% of the patients presenting after elapse of 3h. Only a few patients reported to the hospital within an hour of onset of symptoms (n=23, 8.2%), out of which majority were non-diabetics (n=18). A majority of patients (n=146, 52%) in both groups did not use emergency medical services.

conclusionThis study provides an incentive for further research, aiming to reduce pre hospital delay along with investigating the effectiveness of emergency medical services.

Indexed as

Myocardial RevascularizationAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes MellitusElectrocardiographyEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansIncidenceMaleMyocardial InfarctionPakistanRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesDecision makingDiabetes mellitusMyocardial infarctionPakistanSymptoms

Identifiers

PMID29716701
PMCPMC5993922
OpenAlexW2740965177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.