ArticleParasites & vectors2018
Comparison of McMaster and FECPAK
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- A general framework to support cost-efficient fecal egg count methods and study design choices for large-scale STH deworming programs-monitoring of therapeutic drug efficacy as a case study.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023Trial
- High-throughput detection of parasites and ova in stool using the fully automatic digital feces analyzer, orienter model fa280.Parasites & vectors · 2024Article
- Anthelmintic resistance in soil-transmitted helminths: One-Health considerations.Parasitology research · 2023Review
- Practical guide to the diagnostics of ruminant gastrointestinal nematodes, liver fluke and lungworm infection: interpretation and usability of results.Parasites & vectors · 2023Review
- Comparative Effect of Allicin and Alcoholic Garlic Extract on the Morphology and Infectivity ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Global genomic methylation related to the degree of parasitism in cattle.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Advances in diagnosis and control of anthelmintic resistant gastrointestinal helminths infecting ruminants.Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2022Review
- Comparison of FECPAKParasites & vectors · 2022Article
- The Kubic FLOTAC microscope (KFM): a new compact digital microscope for helminth egg counts.Parasitology · 2021Article
- Point of care colourimetric and lateral flow LAMP assay for the detection of Haemonchus contortus in ruminant faecal samples.Parasite (Paris, France) · 2021Article
- Novel Equine Faecal Egg Diagnostics: Validation of the FECPAKAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- A Qualitative Market Analysis Applied to Mini-FLOTAC and Fill-FLOTAC for Diagnosis of Helminth Infections in Ruminants.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Article
- Development of a Lab-on-a-Disk Platform with Digital Imaging for Identification and Counting of Parasite Eggs in Human and Animal Stool.Micromachines · 2019Article
- Epidemiology of gastrointestinal nematodes of alpacas in Australia: II. A longitudinal study.Parasitology research · 2019Article
- Worm burdens and associated histopathological changes caused by gastrointestinal nematodes in alpacas from Australia.Parasitology research · 2019Article
- Epidemiology of gastrointestinal nematodes of alpacas in Australia: I. A cross-sectional study.Parasitology research · 2019Article
- Modification and optimization of the FECPAKG2 protocol for the detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminth eggs in human stool.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2018Article
- Anthelmintic resistance in gastrointestinal nematodes of alpacas (Vicugna pacos) in Australia.Parasites & vectors · 2018Article
- Multiplexed-tandem PCR (MT-PCR) assay to detect and differentiate gastrointestinal nematodes of alpacas.Parasites & vectors · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the FECPAK
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.