Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29716617›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2018

Focal dose escalation for prostate cancer using

Constantinos Zamboglou, Benedikt Thomann, Khodor Koubar, Peter Bronsert, Tobias Krauss, Hans C Rischke, Ilias Sachpazidis, Vanessa Drendel, Nasr Salman, Kathrin Reichel and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interobserver variability in dominant intraprostatic lesion delineation usingReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Molecular Imaging in Photon Radiotherapy.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The use of PET/MRI in radiotherapy.Insights into imaging · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Intraindividual Comparison Between [Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Constantinos ZamboglouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Robert-Koch Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. constantinos.zamboglou@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7849-7550
Benedikt ThomannDivision of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
Khodor KoubarDivision of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
Peter BronsertDepartment of Pathology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
Tobias KraussDepartment of Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
Hans C RischkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Robert-Koch Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Ilias SachpazidisDivision of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
Vanessa DrendelDepartment of Pathology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
Nasr SalmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Robert-Koch Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Kathrin ReichelDepartment of Urology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
Cordula A JilgDepartment of Urology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
Martin WernerDepartment of Pathology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
Philipp T MeyerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
Michael BockDivision of Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
Dimos BaltasDivision of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany.
Anca L GrosuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Robert-Koch Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFocal radiation therapy has gained of interest in treatment of patients with primary prostate cancer (PCa). The question of how to define the intraprostatic boost volume is still open. Previous studies showed that multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) or PSMA PET alone could be used for boost volume definition. However, other studies proposed that the combined usage of both has the highest sensitivity in detection of intraprostatic lesions. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility and to evaluate the tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of radiation therapy dose painting using

methodsTen patients underwent PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI followed by prostatectomy. Three gross tumour volumes (GTVs) were created based on PET (GTV-PET), mpMRI (GTV-MRI) and the union of both (GTV-union). Two plans were generated for each GTV. Plan95 consisted of whole-prostate IMRT to 77 Gy in 35 fractions and a simultaneous boost to 95 Gy (Plan95

resultsDose constraints of published protocols were reached in every treatment plan. Mean TCP-histo were 99.7% (range: 97%-100%) and 75.5% (range: 33%-95%) for Plan95

conclusionsIMRT dose escalation on GTVs based on mpMRI, PSMA PET/CT and the combination of both was feasible. Boosting GTV-union resulted in significantly higher TCP-histo with no or minimal increase of NTCPs compared to the other plans.

Indexed as

Edetic AcidGallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOligopeptidesOrgans at RiskPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedEdetic Acidgallium 68 PSMA-11Gallium IsotopesGallium RadioisotopesOligopeptidesFocal therapyMRIProstate cancerPSMA PET/CT

Identifiers

PMID29716617
PMCPMC5930745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.