Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29716605›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Integration of the work-related online aftercare intervention 'GSA-online plus' (healthy and without stress at the workplace) into clinical practice: study protocol for an implementation study.

Rüdiger Zwerenz, Katja Böhme, Astrid Wirth, Nicole Labitzke, Sergei Pachtchenko, Manfred E Beutel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03019718 (Implementation of the Online Aftercare Intervention 'GSA-Online Plus'), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03019718 nacompletednot on this map

Implementation of the Online Aftercare Intervention 'GSA-Online Plus' (Healthy and Without Stress at the Workplace)

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohannes Gutenberg University MainzRan2016 to 2017Enrolled88ConditionsImplementationArmsGSA-Online plus
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rüdiger ZwerenzDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Katja BöhmeDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131, Mainz, Germany. k.boehme@uni-mainz.de.
Astrid WirthDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Nicole LabitzkeMedia Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, RP, Germany.
Sergei PachtchenkoKnowledge Media Institute of the University of Koblenz-Landau, Koblenz, RP, Germany.
Manfred E BeutelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, 55131, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund [German Statutory Pension Insurance Scheme] 0423/40-64-50-50
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn a previous RCT we established the efficacy of the psychodynamic online aftercare programme 'GSA-Online' ('Health Training Stress Management at the Workplace') for rehabilitants with work-related stress facing return to work after long-term sickness absence. The purpose of this trial is to implement it into routine care. METHODS/

designThe study is performed in rehabilitation clinics with patients of different medical indications (psychosomatic, orthopedic and cardiological diseases). Rehabilitants get access to the study platform during inpatient medical rehabilitation. 'GSA-Online plus' integrates exploratory and motivational videos on the web application to familiarize potential participants and motivate them to follow through with it. In the 12-week writing intervention, patients write weekly online diary entries, answered by anonymous online therapists within 24 h. Primary outcome measures are the recommendation rate of 'GSA-Online plus' and participation rates of the rehabilitants. As secondary outcomes, psychological symptoms, overall satisfaction, helpfulness of the therapeutic feedback and utilization of 'GSA-Online plus' will be analysed exploratory along with the course of weekly ratings of well-being and work ability. DISCUSSION: Meanwhile many clinical trials and meta-analysis prove that internet-based interventions are effective. This study will add insights on the dissemination and implementation of efficacious, evidence-based online treatments into medical practice. We expect a successful implementation of 'GSA-Online plus' in the clinical routine of the rehabilitation clinics. The focus of evaluation is on acceptance of the programme, both by the physicians in charge and the patients. In the future 'GSA-Online plus' could be implemented as a routine aftercare programme for rehabilitation inpatients with occupational stress.

trial registrationThe trial was retrospectively registered on 6th January 2017 at ClinicalTrials.gov (Trial Registration number: ClinicalTrials Gov ID NCT03019718 ).

Indexed as

AftercareHumansInternetRehabilitation CentersRehabilitation, VocationalResearch DesignWorkplaceImplementation studyInternet-based interventionPsychological online supportRehabilitation aftercareReturn to workWork stress

Identifiers

PMID29716605
PMCPMC5930936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.