ArticlePloS one2018
Fast and simple tool for the quantification of biofilm-embedded cells sub-populations from fluorescent microscopic images.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antimicrobial Properties of Ti- and Zr-Based Nanotextured Thin Film Metallic Glasses AgainstBiomolecules · 2026Article
- Aspartic acid-facilitated remineralization: a bio-inspired alternative to fluoride for enamel repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Article
- The effect of the dual scale surface topography of a surface-modified titanium alloy on its bactericidal activity againstRSC advances · 2025Article
- Nepenthes pitcher fluid for the green synthesis of silver nanoparticles with biofilm inhibition, anticancer and antioxidant properties.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- New BacteriophageViruses · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Antiseptic Drug Candidate Pyridosept in PreclinicalCurrent medicinal chemistry · 2025Article
- Capturing the micro-communities: Insights into biogenesis and architecture of bacterial biofilms.BBA advances · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Analysis of Antimicrobial-Resistant and Biofilm-Forming Pathogens on Biotic and Abiotic Surfaces.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Antimicrobial Potential of the Hop (Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- An Indirect Fluorescence Microscopy Method to Assess Vaginal Lactobacillus Concentrations.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Preferential adhesion of bacterial cells onto top- and bottom-mounted nanostructured surfaces under flow conditions.Nanoscale advances · 2023Article
- The Effect of Ficin Immobilized on Carboxymethyl Chitosan on Biofilms of Oral Pathogens.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Review
- Brightfield vs Fluorescent Staining Dataset-A Test Bed Image Set for Machine Learning based Virtual Staining.Scientific data · 2023Article
- In Silico Guided Nanoformulation Strategy for Circumvention ofACS omega · 2023Article
- Article
- Rapid-killing efficacy substantiates the antiseptic property of the synergistic combination of carvacrol and nerol against nosocomial pathogens.Archives of microbiology · 2022Article
- Fluid Flow Induces Differential Detachment of Live and Dead Bacterial Cells from Nanostructured Surfaces.ACS omega · 2022Article
- An AI-based approach for detecting cells and microbial byproducts in low volume scanning electron microscope images of biofilms.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fluorescent staining is a common tool for both quantitative and qualitative assessment of pro- and eukaryotic cells sub-population fractions by using microscopy and flow cytometry. However, direct cell counting by flow cytometry is often limited, for example when working with cells rigidly adhered either to each other or to external surfaces like bacterial biofilms or adherent cell lines and tissue samples. An alternative approach is provided by using fluorescent microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), which enables the evaluation of fractions of cells subpopulations in a given sample. For the quantitative assessment of cell fractions in microphotographs, we suggest a simple two-step algorithm that combines single cells selection and the statistical analysis. To facilitate the first step, we suggest a simple procedure that supports finding the balance between the detection threshold and the typical size of single cells based on objective cell size distribution analysis. Based on a series of experimental measurements performed on bacterial and eukaryotic cells under various conditions, we show explicitly that the suggested approach effectively accounts for the fractions of different cell sub-populations (like the live/dead staining in our samples) in all studied cases that are in good agreement with manual cell counting on microphotographs and flow cytometry data. This algorithm is implemented as a simple software tool that includes an intuitive and user-friendly graphical interface for the initial adjustment of algorithm parameters to the microphotographs analysis as well as for the sequential analysis of homogeneous series of similar microscopic images without further user intervention. The software tool entitled BioFilmAnalyzer is freely available online at https://bitbucket.org/rogex/biofilmanalyzer/downloads/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.