ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2018
Advancing the Practice of CRCs: Why Professional Development Matters.
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Supporting frontline staff in frontotemporal degeneration research.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Completion of a standardizable competency-based research training program improves understanding and preparedness for both new and experienced clinical research professionals.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Real-world mastery of essential skills in a clinical research coordinator graduate program.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- What PIs want when hiring a clinical research coordinator.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Conceptualization, development, and early dissemination of eMPACTJournal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- A novel model of inter-institutional, peer-led, competency-based, interactive workshops for continuing education and professional development of clinical research professionals.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Clinical research resource support for off-site research coordinators in intensive and specialty care units.Clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Awareness of Clinical Research Coordinators Toward Ethics and Protection of Clinical Trial Patients.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2023Article
- Clinical research coordinators' instructional preferences for competency content delivery.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2018Article
- Ensuring Representativeness in Competencies for Research Coordinators.Clinical researcher (Alexandria, Va.) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Clinical research coordinators (CRCs) assume critical responsibilities central to the success of the research team. The complexity of their role requires essential professional qualifications. One barrier to professionalization, however, has been the inconsistent, or absent, competency-based training. This study explored participants' perceptions of training experiences designed to prepare them for the national certification exam. Focus group methodology was used to document their experiences. The findings showed that sustainable mentoring relationships developed, participant confidence levels increased, and anxiety about performance capacity diminished. Cognitive reframing of the work environment and CRC roles was facilitated by training that fostered sharing and social reinforcement of professional and personal identities. Findings from this study suggest that access to meaningful training and quality instruction supports the professionalization of CRCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.