Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29713984›Full record

ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2018

Biomarkers of Barrett's Esophagus: From the Laboratory to Clinical Practice.

Vani J A Konda, Rhonda F Souza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Identification ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  4. Molecular biomarkers of progression from Barrett's esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Best Practices in Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Marker of Progression from Non-Dysplastic Barrett's Esophagus to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: a Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vani J A KondaDepartment of Medicine and the Center for Esophageal Diseases, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas and the Center for Esophageal Research, Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, 2 Hoblitzelle, Suite 250, 3500 Gaston Avenue, Dallas, TX, 75246, USA.
Rhonda F SouzaDepartment of Medicine and the Center for Esophageal Diseases, Baylor University Medical Center at Dallas and the Center for Esophageal Research, Baylor Scott and White Research Institute, 2 Hoblitzelle, Suite 250, 3500 Gaston Avenue, Dallas, TX, 75246, USA. Rhonda.Souza@BSWHealth.org.

Funding

Role of Acid in the Development of Barrett's EsophagusR01DK063621 · NIDDK · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI SOUZA, RHONDA F, SPECHLER, STUART JON · 2002 to 2015
$3.4M
Reflux-Induced Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Benign Barrett's EsophagusR01DK103598 · NIDDK · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI SOUZA, RHONDA F, SPECHLER, STUART JON · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Endoscopic, Histologic, and Molecular Characterization of Esophageal Wound Healing after Radiofrequency Ablation of Barrett's EsophagusR21DK111369 · NIDDK · BAYLOR RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI SOUZA, RHONDA F, SPECHLER, STUART JON · 2017 to 2018
$448k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK063621NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK103598NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK111369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The currently recommended approach to managing cancer risk for patients with Barrett's esophagus is endoscopic surveillance including a biopsy protocol to sample the esophageal tissue randomly to detect dysplasia. However, there are numerous limitations in this practice that rely on the histopathological grading of dysplasia alone to make clinical decisions. The availability of in silico models demonstrating the potential cost-effectiveness of biomarker-based stratification has increased interest in finding a clinically relevant "Barrett's biomarker." The success of endoscopic eradication therapy in preventing neoplastic progression of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus has promoted the desire to stratify non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus to those with "high risk" that may benefit from endotherapy. Furthermore, on the other end of the spectrum, there is interest in searching for a "low risk" marker that may identify those that would not likely benefit from endoscopy screening or surveillance. This review highlights recent data from the genomics (r)evolution revealing new genetic biomarkers of susceptibility to the development of Barrett's esophagus and novel pathways for its neoplastic progression, addresses the development of new modes of tissue sampling and imaging to detect early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus, and discusses current progress in moving biomarkers from the laboratory into clinical practice in the era of precision medicine.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaBarrett EsophagusEsophageal NeoplasmsGenetic MarkersGene AmplificationGenomic InstabilityHumansOncogenesPrecancerous ConditionsGenetic MarkersAdenocarcinomaEndoscopic imagingEndotherapyGenomicsRisk Stratification

Identifiers

PMID29713984
PMCPMC6054820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.